Was it Right to Leak the Afghanistan Information?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Frank Drebin

Police Squad!
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
456
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/afghanistan-the-war-logs

US says Wikileaks could 'threaten national security

The United States has condemned as "irresponsible" the leak of 90,000 military records, saying publication could threaten national security.

The documents released by the Wikileaks website include details of killings of Afghan civilians unreported until now.

Three news organisations had advance access to the records, which also show Nato concerns that Pakistan and Iran are helping the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Pakistan has denied claims its intelligence agency backed the Taliban.

The huge cache of classified papers - posted by Wikileaks as the Afghan War Diary - is one of the biggest leaks in US history. It was given to the New York Times, the Guardian and the German news magazine, Der Spiegel.

The founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, said he had no reason to doubt the reliability of the reports.

"When we publish material, what we say is: the document as we describe it is true," he said at a news conference in London.

"We publish CIA reports all the time. They are legitimate reports, but they don't mean the CIA is telling the truth."

Mr Assange said there was no one overarching revelation to come out of the cache.

"The real story of this material is that it's war - it's one damn thing after another," he said. "It is the continuous small events, the continuous deaths of children, insurgents, allied forces, the maimed people. Search for the word 'amputation' in this material, or 'amputee', and there are dozens and dozens of references."
Taliban-ISI meetings?

In a statement, US National Security Adviser Gen James Jones said such classified information "could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk".

He said the documents covered the period from 2004 to 2009, before President Obama "announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan".

But Mr Assange was sceptical, saying: "A new policy by Obama doesn't mean new practice by the US military."

Pakistan denied claims its intelligence agency, the ISI, backed the Taliban in the war in Afghanistan.

One of the leaked documents refers to an alleged meeting between insurgents and the former Pakistani intelligence chief, Lt Gen Hamid Gul.

He dismissed the Wikileaks material as "pure fiction which is being sold as intelligence".

"It's not intelligence," Lt Gen Gul told the BBC. "It may have a financial angle to it but more than that it is not hardcore (intelligence). I'm an old veteran. I know. This is not intelligence."

The reports also suggest:

* The Taliban has had access to portable heat-seeking missiles to shoot at aircraft
* A secret US unit of army and navy special forces has been engaged on missions to "capture or kill" top insurgents
* Many civilian casualties - caused by Taliban roadside bombs and Nato missions that went wrong - have gone unreported


'Civilian deaths'

But the head of the Foreign Relations Committee in the US Senate said the leak came at a "critical stage" for US policy in the region.

"However illegally these documents came to light, they raise serious questions about the reality of America's policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan," Democratic senator John Kerry said.

Wikileaks says it has delayed the release of about 15,000 reports from the archive as part of a "harm minimisation process demanded by our source".

The Guardian and the New York Times say they had no contact with the original source of the leak, but spent weeks crosschecking the information.

Earlier this year, Wikileaks posted a video on its website which it said showed the killings of civilians by the US military in Baghdad in 2007.

A US military analyst, Bradley Manning, is awaiting trial on criminal charges of leaking the video.

A former hacker, Adrian Lamo, said Mr Manning boasted to him about handing over military videos and 260,000 classified US embassy messages to Wikileaks.

Wikileaks has refused to identify its source for the video or the US military documents.

Meanwhile, Nato says it is investigating reports that as many as 45 civilians died in an air strike in Helmand province on Friday. A BBC journalist has spoken to villagers in Regey who said they witnessed the incident.

A Nato spokesman said international forces went to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties.
 
Julian Assange on the Afghanistan war logs: 'They show the true nature of this war'

Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, explains why he decided to publish thousands of secret US military files on the war in Afghanistan

unfortunately only on a not transcribed video here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2010/jul/25/julian-assange-wikileaks-interview-warlogs



so, what's more important, vague claims of national security or the public's right to know what's going on?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom