Then The Bank of Genghis Khan takes the restaurant from him
Off note: What careers would the leaders have? Because I see Haile Selassie as a lawyer for some reason
See previous: Kamehameha's role in a certain kind of establishment...
Then The Bank of Genghis Khan takes the restaurant from him
Off note: What careers would the leaders have? Because I see Haile Selassie as a lawyer for some reason
Ramesses: For some reason I see him as a children's tv show host.
Suleiman: Bank manager.
Alexander: Real estate broker.
Ramses would be the creepy guy that has all the children sitting around him on his throne. For Atilla I'm thinking an actor. He can be very dramatic.
Attila would probably be a better Reality T.V All-Star.. drama and crying in the bushes! (anyone got that reference?)
Other contendors for Reality T.V would probably be Maria I, Nebuchadnezzar, Montezuma, Alexander, and anybody who's bit too much in general.
I can see Gajah Mada being a sumo wrestler, Pocatello be a tour guide, Hiawatha being an environmentalist, and such.
Enrico Dandolo would just be there to provide some atmosphere during the night.
Environmentalist with a fur coat?
I didn't read the whole thread but, I have to say, Montezuma ( at least the way everyone is depicted in the game ) would absolutely devastate every other leader. He's clearly deranged and absolutely filled with primal violence.
Monty is strong, monty is fast, and monty is brutal, but he lacks armor and doesn't have the strategic mind to defeat some of physically bigger or tactically superior. I'd say Pachacutti, Genghis Khan, Oda Nobunaga, Kamehameha, Alexander, Napoleon (given his sabre), and maybe Attila would be able to best him.
What about Ashurbanipal or Shaka?
Monty is strong, monty is fast, and monty is brutal, but he lacks armor and doesn't have the strategic mind to defeat some of physically bigger or tactically superior. I'd say Pachacutti, Genghis Khan, Oda Nobunaga, Kamehameha, Alexander, Napoleon (given his sabre), and maybe Attila would be able to best him.
What about Askia, or Harald?
Washington will win.
He can harness the power of FREEDOM!
Washington will win.
He can harness the power of FREEDOM!
Harald no (too slow and clunky, lacks tactics. I know vikings are fast, but all that armor has got to limit his mobility), Askia no (in game he lays down his sword and goes into fisticuffs during war , IRL he was a general and a king, not a warrior).
Askia, I get. But you saying Harald's armor makes him clunky, then why did you point out Montezuma being unarmored on the cons side?