most American movies you see that promote a worldview of US moral superiority and dominance.
Especially war movies. However, there are some which don't do this. For example "The Thin Red Line".
"The Patriot" does do this, but I still liked it, because there they fought for their freedom.
I don't know why people bash "Braveheart". It is such a Scottish Robin Hood - based on a real historical person, who became a legendary person (i.e. his current image which can be found in popular culture is historically inaccurate). But such legends usually promote positive traits of character, models of behaviour.
History is full of such legends and inaccuracies. And this is true for history of each country.
The existence of such legends is not bad
per se. These are idealized images, but they can promote some positive values if used properly.
But people should realize that these images are idealized and not totally accurate.
========================================
We need a movie about Henry IV and the time when he fought for the Teutonic Order in Lithuania in years 1390 - 1392.
That was - of course - before he became the king. At that time he was "only" the Count of Northampton.
In 1390 he came to the State of the Teutonic Order as one of "Knight Guests" and then he participated in the Second Civil War in Lithuania.
He did not come alone, but he had a unit of - on average - 160 soldiers under his command in period August 1390 - April 1391:
- 13 knights
- 18 squires
- ca. 60 sergeants / armed retainers / men-at-arms
- ca. 50 armed volunteers
- 10 diggers / engineers
- 3 heralds
- 6 minstrels
It is believed that some of them were those famous longbowmen.
I suppose that very few (if any) people in England even know about this episode from Henry IV Lancaster's life.
History of Eastern Europe - and even their own participation in it - is a great mystery for people there.