m15a
Emperor
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 1,471
It's a problem to try and make a game not sexist when it's based on history, which has been sexist
I think I see what you're saying, but I think the key is to not be committed to the criteria that the best leaders for the game are the ones that were the most powerful or most effective or even most famous. I don't think any of those factors were ever strictly adhered to in a Civilization game anyway. I like the approach that was used in the Civ V expansions - leaders that had an interesting story that fit with an interesting bonus. A lot of the suggestions in this thread fit those criteria pretty well, often because they don't fit the mold of a typical leader.