civhelp121
Prince
by the way, how do I know how good a graphics card is? Like whether it is integrated or not? Cause the numbers seem random
I don't play Starcraft either. In any case, I don't mind choppy/slow games even at minimum graphics, I dealt with the same thing with Civ IV mods on my old computer so its nothing new. As long as the game is up and running, I'm happy.
By the way, is there anyway to upgrade the video card, if necessary? Would upgrading RAM or the video card be more important?
by the way, how do I know how good a graphics card is? Like whether it is integrated or not? Cause the numbers seem random
I was afraid of that. Any advice on the video card and/or power supply?You can add more, but you cannot use more.
You can add more, but you cannot use more.
a) if it's from Intel, or if the card is integrated: Don't think about it.
b) If it's from Nvidia or ATI: Then it's good.
c) Look at the numbers (dependend on company): Only the first 2 matter (higher = better). The first says in general, if the card is newer (9 is newer than 8 is newer than 7 etc), the second is about the performance (1,2,3 low, 4,5,6 medium, 7,8,9 high).
The other numbers and attached letters (GT, GS) do in most cases not really matter (not for us). But if you want to be sure, you have to google it.
Does anyone know if Civ V will be able to use more than 4GBs of RAM?
Below 50$ = crapby the way, how do I know how good a graphics card is? Like whether it is integrated or not? Cause the numbers seem random
I'm about to buy this Acer laptop:
i3 2,13 GHZ (2 cores)
4 GB RAM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1 GB, directX 11 support)
Is this good enough for the recommended requirements?
I'm asking because processor only has 2 cores and the graphic card is below the recommended 4800-series on this scale: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
If the above isn't good enough and what would be best my best option: To get a quad core i7-processor (with only 1,6 GHz) or is it better to get a better graphic card than 5650? I don't think I can afford both options...
Does anyone know if Civ V will be able to use more than 4GBs of RAM?
I'm about to buy this Acer laptop:
i3 2,13 GHZ (2 cores)
4 GB RAM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1 GB, directX 11 support)
Is this good enough for the recommended requirements?
If the above isn't good enough and what would be best my best option: To get a quad core i7-processor (with only 1,6 GHz) or is it better to get a better graphic card than 5650? I don't think I can afford both options...
rather enables you to run at a higher display resolution and with more effects/higher quality graphics, while using more demanding levels of AF and AA without dipping into unplayable framerate.As a general rule ... GPU speeds up time during your turn.
These are the specs for my Dell XPS 420
Operating System: Windows® Vista Home Premium SP2
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40Ghz
Memory: 3GB RAM
Hard Disk Space: 300GB HDD about 140GB free.
DVD-ROM Drive: Got one
Video: 256 MB ATI HD2600 XT
Sound: Don't know, don't care. Whatever it came with from the factory.
DirectX®: DirectX® version 11
As you can see, my system meets or exceeds all the minimum requirements. My main concern is the video card. What are my best upgrade options (most bang for the buck) for about $120 ? I have no preference between ATI or nVidia. All I care about is a high quality product from a reliable vendor. And will a new video card necessitate an upgrade of the stock 375w power supply?
My second concern is the memory. According to this page 32 bit Vista has a 4gb limit on physical memory. Does that mean I can add another GB of Ram? I ask because there is a lot of confusing info out "there" concerning the memory limit with 32 bit Vista. More memory isn't a must have. Thanks in advance.
Thanks for the reply. I'll look into those cards you suggested. I will most likely put in a new power supply from Corsair just for the peace of mind.This GeForce GTS 250 for $80 after rebate is a good option, as is this Radeon 4850 for $95 after rebate. Neither of these should require a PSU upgrade. As far as RAM, it's pretty confusing - I'd say to not bother adding any unless you plan to move to a 64-bit OS.
This GeForce GTS 250 for $80 after rebate is a good option, as is this Radeon 4850 for $95 after rebate. Neither of these should require a PSU upgrade. As far as RAM, it's pretty confusing - I'd say to not bother adding any unless you plan to move to a 64-bit OS.
Thanks for the reply. I'll look into those cards you suggested. I will most likely put in a new power supply from Corsair just for the peace of mind.
That SAPPHIRE Vapor-X looks like the better choice. It has the best cooling solution available for this class of cards. The GTS 250 might suffer in demanding situations due to it only having 512 MB Vram, as the pre 4xx nVidia cards tend to be video memory hogs.
A high quality 375W PSU should be more than sufficient for any of those cards, unless you plan to seriously overclock your CPU and/or GPU. The higher recommendations given by the video card manufacturers are assuming a worst case of some rubbish no-name PSU in combination with a high strung system.
Mostly makes sense, apart from hexa-core CPUs and a dual PCIe 16x slot mainboards being of no use for the non-enthusiast. SLI/Crossfire rarely makes any sense at all, and you will be extremely hard pressed to find a game that runs faster on a Phenom X6 than on a comparable or even lower priced quad core.Also, for people who want to build a new desktop (it's really easy as long as you have an afternoon to do it and get Windows installed), I like Tech Report's system guides. In the current guide, I'd recommend "The Utility Player" if you can swing it, but even The Econobox should play Civ 5 pretty well.