GeoModder
Deity
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 7,512
Please add page reference to where this should be updated.
I wasn't quoting an error in the manual, only what's been told on the forums and what I now have read in it.
Please add page reference to where this should be updated.
Thaks bhavv, but I already have both of those in the OP.
Longhouse p 166 and p 215 - Does this UB really lose the workshop +20% to building production?
should be "must" instead of cannot right?Effects: +15% Production, but the City cannot be located on a Hill.
Edited for clarificationThat seems a lot of things to fix. Is most of the spanish manual similarly as bad?
In general there seem to be a lot of inconsistencies between different language versions of the manual. I just saw SimonL point out a typo on the Statue of Liberty and noticed the English and French versions disagree on whether it's +1 or +2 science per specialist.
It seems this is getting out of hand.
Inconsistency on page 226: license condition h forbids altering the game or any part of it in any way, no exception made for modding, but page 194 encourages people to alter files. Also in press statements and on forums 2k employees have claimed that the game is made to be modded. The license should be fixed to allow modding and distributing mods, optionally specifying which files are allowed to be changed and distributed and which files not.
Of course it's copy paste, but in many countries those licenses are enforceable, including most states in the US and a number of European countries.This is probably just a lawyer copy-pasting. On page 227 there is text under the USER CREATED CONTENT heading that seems to permit and limit mods.
I don't believe "click to accept" licenses actually have any legal effect anyway, or at least not all the terms would necessarily be legally enforceable.