Recent content by usi

I'm happy to know that you are pretty knowledgeable and polite, since talking with someone like you is far more beneficial than talking with a typical online Korean nationalist. That's shorter than alternative terms but conveys no meaning for most people who have not learned Korean calendar...

Dah, OK, I admit that sometimes I have been reading RFC threads. I terribly hate some seemingly Korean people making cheap lies about Japan. You know, Non-Koreans rarely ever use terms like Imjin War, since "Imjin" is comprehensible only to Koreans. Korea brought culture to Japan. That's...

Great, this mod put me back to ciV! :lol: I skipped some questions to which I have no opinion. 4. Most often used (as in, won with) victory condition? I quit when I'm sure I'll win, but I usually go for domination. 5. Most commonly played: Map size, map type, game speed, difficulty...

Just won on Deity having 22 turns to spare. Basics 1) Sell resources & GPT before DOW to get golds and/or cities (yes, sometimes you can buy a city). 2) Always ask others to fight with one another. It's OK that everyone hates you, as long as s/he is also hated by others. 3) Mass-produce...

Here's what happened: 1) I sold Xian to Wu for 298 golds & 69 GPT 2) On the next turn, the GPT was suddenly cancelled without DOW or any other clear reasons 3) I checked the diplo view and found that Wu had -292 golds (how did she lose this much money?) and 75 GPT 4) Then I talked with Wu...

Shafernator got fixed, and Babylon's one is now working. EDIT: Looks like NOT all the problems were fixed. Building a Lancer still seems to be ignored.

I totally agree, and that's exactly my point. Neither population nor money itself should make a civ technologically advanced, while production and money from population, trade, etc can be used to unlock its people's potential. That's why I think we need maintenance fees and local...

BTW, I don't know why there's :lol: at the beginning of my previous post. It was just me clicking somewhere wrong - no offense intended. Nope. Research agreements require two or more civs to (1) exist close enough to meet, (2) be cooperative with one another, and (3) be rich enough...

:lol: I agree, but does that affect my conclusion? My point: In ciV, the capability to make use of a tech is already represented by production Your point: Gold can also be used to make a civ quickly utilize its newly acquired techs Your point is already represented ciV as...

Sorry, but I don't quite get what you mean. In ciV, the capability to make use of a tech is already represented as production. Thus the following two ideas don't contradict each other: (1) A civ should be able to discover techs not based on its population size (2) A civ with a lot of...

Technologically advanced != crazy about military :eek: What you are implying is like saying North Korea is more advanced than South Korea. A gangster might be able to beat up a university professor, but the latter person is usually more "advanced" than the former person in most aspects...

I want maintenance costs and local unhappiness back! It's just nonsense that Mongolia-like mega-empires ignoring happiness and infrastructures can be way more scientific than everyone else. The upcoming patch should fix this issue a bit, but I guess it will only be, "Keep happiness just a...

No way. I would have bought those to support them if I were more satisfied with the game though...

The poll is about which civ has the lowest Merit to be included (not just historical importance, longevity, or other "this civ is better than another" stuffs), right? Yeah, Iroquois arguably had lower historical importance than many Euro civs, but there are already so many Euro civs, so the...

Then why did you bother learning English, which based on your opinion would soon be unimportant? :lol: Reading your other posts, I guess you are probably a Chinese or ABC, who could learn the "Mother language" and get away from the collapsing empire...