So I am trying my hand at a deity game for a change (usually I play Immortal) and while I failed with Russia miserable, I am going for Babylon as I really want a science victory and not necessarily domination.
I started this map and on turn 3 I find Skilldorado with my Warrior. On turn 4 I...
I am amazed at the sheer amount of specialists (no pun intended) we seem to have on this forum.
Every other person claims to know the psychology of why CIV 5 sucks. Even better, every one of them also knows that everyone else thinks like they do and must thus surely hate CIV 5 just as much...
The discussion about leaderheads for Civ 4 and 5 gave me an idea...
I would find it kinda cool to have real life actors play the leader roles in an upcoming Civ 6 or something. So if they could pull it off and get celebs, who would you want to see as which leader?
I'll start with a few...
howdy,
I read a bit through various articles about GP Farms but still have some questions. I must admit I never really used a GP Farm specifically (it just so happened that I had some cities producing GPs at a decent rate) so I want to try one tonight with a philosophical leader, parthenon...
So here I thought (or knew, from experience) that if I am at war with a civilization and suddenly they become a vassal with another one that I am peace with, I automatically make peace with the one I am at war at.
Interestingly enough, it doesn't seem to be the other way around. Yesterday I...
So I moved up to prince yesterday and was playing a fair game as Ramesses II with Pacal, Sury and Joao. We were all Hindi and it was a love fest (friendly, friendly, pleased).
So the AP elections come up and Sury gets elected. Here I wonder 'why him and not me' (it was him or me to chose...
Howdy,
I just recently "discovered" Charlemagne and the HRE. I have been blissfully ignoring him until now.
Now, in my limited knowledge of game mechanics and blissful ignorance of the higher concepts of this game, I think he is a pretty good leader to play with. Unfortunately I haven't...
howdy fellow fanatics,
I have a problem and it is about how long my games take. I usually have one or two evenings per week (ca. 4hrs per evening) to play Civ4. I would love to be able to start and finish (and hopefully win :lol:) one game per evening. From what I read in the forums, 4hrs...
I seem to run in a recurring problem in most of my games: Number of cities.
Let me elaborate...
I often read about how having lots of cities (i.e. for a cultural game, 9 cities is optimal due to being able to create the necessary temples for the cathedral type building) is generally a good...
Hi there,
I intend to try a cultural victory on noble before I move up to the next difficulty level. I read up on some strategies and pointers and thought of a rough plan on how I go on about this game.
However, I do have some questions that I'd rather have answered than find out by trial...
I was wondering if anyone else has this problem or is annoyed with it.
Sometimes I tend to either misclick or click too fast (i.e. go to) and then realise that my unit is now wasted or something like that. In such situations I really wish there was an option to at least undo your last turn in...
SO with great interest, amusement and way too much time on my hands (at work...) I read these forums and often see a remark or punchline about Ghandi being weak and sucking big time.
I just finished a warlord level map (ok, it's "only" warlord, I agree) where I dominated the whole game in...
so I have read a lot about the SE and frankly, I find it more appealing than the CE, in terms of gameplay. it seems you have to do and think more (?).
anyhow,
so I build my cities with already a rough idea which is gonna be which (production, science, etc.) and let them grow a bit.
now...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.