Search results

BtS includes Warlords.

Username: Gregski Chatname: gregski Residing: In a floating castle somewhere Mandate: None Former Mandate: Was mayor once Aspiring: Start a war Age: 32 Gender: M Location: Budapest (GMT + 1) City Name:

I had a weirder solution: Alt+Tab out of Civ4, then click on the Civ4 app to return to it and your menu should be restored.

Username: Gregski Chatname: Gregski Residing: Lurking in a goody hut Mandate: Civ4 Wannabe Former Mandate: Mayor Aspiring: Perfect my empty-headed voting system Age: 31 Gender: M Location: I don't have a RL.

Okay, how about a new way of looking at the issue: What changes would be required for you to be able to actively participate in DG6/7? I'll list some of my reasons: 1. A simple clearly defined leadership structure and ruleset IMHO we need fewer elected people not more; more people only...

Hey, stop picking on me! Ah well, now that I'm a ghost, I can travel through walls and stuff like that...

The clue lies in the line "assailant was very specific in what he was looking and it seemed that he found it". This would point to an intelligence officer, i.e. Snyder.

Army army army. We need an army. Aren't we a nation that strives for culture? What better way to achieve that than through war?

I don't have Conquests so I only have a general idea as to what's going on.

Army of Knights would greatly boost our offensive capabilities, first choice for me.

Admittedly Vikings like to use big two hand-handed axes, clearly no one would lug a thing like that around when planning a murder. Definitely a Viking job so my vote goes to Harold of the HC.

No worries, she has already apologised. Several times.

It's Don Vincenzo actually. Anyway, the most suspicious character is Steven, so I vote for him.

I like the civ 3 style air units better even if it is a bit underpowered. I'd prefer to be able to bombard units and bombard city improvements as two distinct options. Of course, there is no guarantee in either, but a greatly increased probability of 'hitting the right thing'. Taking out any...

An alternative to canals would be the port facility. Now I don't mean the civ 2 improvement, I am thinking along the lines of a radar tower in PTW. You can build a port facility on any flat square (no forest/jungle, hill, mountains etc) that is coastal and next to a city. That square would be...

I think that we should, uh 'annex' them. They would be better off if part of a powerful empire. Destroy is such a negative word...

It appears the thread is not the murder victim... But Greekguy is right, we need only a few more people when the fun really starts.

Quite right, it's not right to give pressies to our enemies.

We need to keep them. If we raze the cities, we would have to rebuild all the remaining improvements that we could have got by simply marching in and taking over. The flip risk is not a major threat.

Can someone point out the altered functionality of the FP in Conquests plz? If it's not a second palace, what specific benefits does it have?