Search results

columbo = vigilante on television columbine = something else entirely.

this file IS on the CD you know... i think it's on radgametools.com

Light infantry with anti tank weapons easily destroy tanks. The sheer number of men in an infantry division poses an incredible threat to the relative slow rate of fire of armored division. They would get slaughtered, some of them, sure, but they have an excellent chance at destroying an armored...

I suppose the reason why they did the combat system this way was so that the results were realistic (the naval aspect of it not withstanding), like the real world. I can easily imagine some Afghan freedom fighters running up to a tank and taking it over or at least putting up a good fight...

and you guys wonder why firaxis guys never post here with all the whining when someone DOES reply? thanks for taking the time to keep us updated dan. it's appreciated!

i think the bonus should only be given to pincer attacks. It's so easy to flank attack a city it's kind of meaningless (a one turn movement at WORSE. a slight, say 10% bonus should be giving units attacking from the opposite direction of the first attack, sense it's SLIGHTLY harder to do...

i'm playing on a standard map, 4 civs. the year is 1940. i'm the first to research refining back in the 1810s. i wait like 10 turns, no oil. i thought, hmm... maybe the others civs will have them once they get refining. so i GIVE refining to all the other civs. wait another 10 turns. still no...

about the gameplay vs realism: see... i've only wanted to change things that as is, negatively effect gameplay. i'm not a realism freak. (if i was, then in the modern ages almost EVERY thing would have a movement of 36) there's limits to movement and things. it's BAD for gameplay that pikemen...

This patch includes all changes from the previous mod by Anunikoba: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7714 PLUS Increased range of Paratroopers to 8: To make them a lot more useful Fixed bombardment strength of Cruise Missile to 18: There was a bug that set...

Re: DaEezt Re: #2: Good point. I was just considering that. I think the operational range for air superiority (if it really does fix the bomber escort problem) should be set to equal the operational range of the aircraft, not HALF as it is currently. Re: #4: Complete agree. Re: #7...

First off, I LOVE CIV3 and can't stop playing. This is the first time in a LONG while I've gotten so much into a game that I go on the boards to complain. anyways, now i can start ranting: I haven't really seen this mentioned much, but DAMN that broken air superiority pisses me off. It pretty...