Askthepizzaguy
Know the Dark Side
These are the current candidates and cases made on them, in no particular order.
Of those, my comments:
The votes on landlubber are because I feel landlubber was trying to silence me early, but murdering me outright so soon will now point fingers back at him.
Izipo seems indifferent to the fact that he's even been voted. If he continues to not react to votes, lynch him in the next round. I'd like to give him some time to react at least.
The votes on Seon I feel are jumping to conclusions/bad reasoning. He could very well be guilty, but not for the reasons stated. It's a bad case.
Voting for civplayah may or may not be a wise idea, townies make bad cases all the time. At least it was an attempt to put pressure on someone.
The votes for Frozen in Ice at least make sense from a vague tactical standpoint. It's possible the scum will perform last minute switches to spare an ally early in the game, because half the time it garners no real suspicion, and the rewards are obvious. Picking on lurkers is a favored tactic of mafia and townies alike. Quick to condemn is a valid enough point. Mafia do like to pick on targets that cannot fight back. I feel the case on Frozen has merit, if only a little.
Niklas for being too quiet, well it's not out of the norm, but why not pressure him anyway and get him more actively involved in the discussion. I'd rather have active townies and mafiosi so there's something to analyze, and the more involved each townie is, the better we stand. Lurker/apathetic towns go nowhere and always lose.
Romanichine "quick" to cast disfavor of Seon, he's already responded to such and I don't see anything more substantial there.
I would recommend keeping Frozen and lubber and Niklas as suspects, and adding more nominees. The others I don't feel there is anything but randomness or bad reasoning behind it.
Of those, my comments:
The votes on landlubber are because I feel landlubber was trying to silence me early, but murdering me outright so soon will now point fingers back at him.
Izipo seems indifferent to the fact that he's even been voted. If he continues to not react to votes, lynch him in the next round. I'd like to give him some time to react at least.
The votes on Seon I feel are jumping to conclusions/bad reasoning. He could very well be guilty, but not for the reasons stated. It's a bad case.
Voting for civplayah may or may not be a wise idea, townies make bad cases all the time. At least it was an attempt to put pressure on someone.
The votes for Frozen in Ice at least make sense from a vague tactical standpoint. It's possible the scum will perform last minute switches to spare an ally early in the game, because half the time it garners no real suspicion, and the rewards are obvious. Picking on lurkers is a favored tactic of mafia and townies alike. Quick to condemn is a valid enough point. Mafia do like to pick on targets that cannot fight back. I feel the case on Frozen has merit, if only a little.
Niklas for being too quiet, well it's not out of the norm, but why not pressure him anyway and get him more actively involved in the discussion. I'd rather have active townies and mafiosi so there's something to analyze, and the more involved each townie is, the better we stand. Lurker/apathetic towns go nowhere and always lose.
Romanichine "quick" to cast disfavor of Seon, he's already responded to such and I don't see anything more substantial there.
I would recommend keeping Frozen and lubber and Niklas as suspects, and adding more nominees. The others I don't feel there is anything but randomness or bad reasoning behind it.
