aelf
Ashen One
I think that people are focusing too much on the shooting and videos. What Newbunkle mentioned seems closer to the point of this thread: it was festering, and just needed a trigger - any trigger. It also means that it'll not be some isolated incident.
The government reaction so far demonstrates why the police is one of the main targets of the riots: all the government can think of to deal with social problems is to throw police at them. Obviously, the police will continue to be constructed as en enemy to attack.
The other main target have been stores, and (it looks to me, on what news I've seen) chain stores selling brand products. And for an explanation of that, we have only to look at the price of those products, at wages (or unemployment benefits and social assistance) and at the daily barrage of advertisement associating said products with status and happiness. The rioters are mostly people priced out of conspicuous consumption, yet nevertheless daily encouraged to engage in it.
We can't have a society which both glorifies consumption, glamorizes brand names, etc, and has a large portion of the population unable to do it legally, without setting the stage for explosions of violence like this one. The peaceful solutions are either to take away the emphasis from consumption (but retail commerce and advertisement have grown so important that it'll be very hard to change that culture), or to enforce a much greater income equality so that every one can afford to be a dull middle class consumer. The other solutions is what the british government is attempting: thrown police at any inconvenient breakdown of the system and hope that repression alone can keep it going as it is.
I agree entirely with this. But I think there's also the feeling amongst the working class that they are being abandoned with the cuts to public services. That is what's new, and what took the social tensions to the level that was necessary for the riots to be triggered.