The Breaking Storm, 1919-1945

The candy stripes ("traitor stripes", as I sometimes call them) are indeed for aerial identification. Our glorious allies managed to attack their own ships early in the war, so they just wanted to be sure it wouldn't happen again.

All of the Allied aircraft flying on June 6, 1944 were painted with Invasion Stripes of white and black on the night of June 5th, and had the paint washed off of them the night of June 6th to avoid friendly fire incidents. I would suggest some caution in using the term "traitor stripes".
 
The British torpedoes used at Taranto had magnetic exploders and were set to explode underneath the bottom of the Italian ships, making them much more lethal for their size. Some of them worked properly, but one underneath either the Duilio or the Cavour did not, complicating salvage attempts. At that time, the British torpedoes probably were not equipped with Torpex loaded heads. Torpex, or TORPedo EXplosive, is twice as effective in causing damage as TNT. Following the problems with the magnetic exploder during the attacks on the Bismarck, the British disabled the magnetic exploder feature. The Pugliese system used on the Littorio-class ships performed reasonably well, but was hampered by "poor structural connections" (Norman Friedman Battleship Design and Development 1905-1945). The Vittorio Veneto maintained a speed of 19 knots following a aerial torpedo hit from the British during the Battle off Cape Matapan in March of 1941. That was a contact verses a underbottom magnetic hit, however.

The British, the Germans, and the US all tried to use magnetic exploders in World War 2, and all ended up retiring them.

The torpedo protection system on the King George the Fifth class ships also had its problems, as demonstrated by the sinking of the Prince of Wales, following a limited number of hits. Side Note: There is limited discussion of torpedo protection systems in open literature as the US Navy views all such discussions subject to classification. It is a very sensitive subject.

Timerover, I'm probably repeating myself but, IMHO, as far as all Naval matters are concerned, you rule :king:

Cheers,
Oz
 
When I come back from my hollyday trip, what miracle can I see ? The Le Fantasque Class! :):clap:

Delta, you have an extraordinary sense for creating wonderful destroyer units. The "Le Fantasque" will strightly go to the next version of SOE and your Richelieu comes just in time for the upload of the new RARR-Mod and the betatest-version of the new CCM. Of course it will also be in the next version of SOE (what will come after RARR and CCM version 2).

Delta, thank you very, very much for your great support of CCM, RARR and SOE! :thanx:
 
Update: Thanks to Laurana Kanan all of the previews are made and up to date! YAY!!!

Almost...The British have a light cruiser and a couple battlecruisers, and the Japanese have two destroyers that need to be updated. Then it's on to the Age of Navalism!
 
Update: Ibuki Class Heavy Cruiser added to the database. Preview Below:

Spoiler :
ibuki_F4e.jpg
 
Great Sir,
we already have a Colorado after it was refitted for WW2, so I guess this got to be squeezed in before that and after Tennesse.

I would like to know if one could make these upgrade, as with Colorado WW1 to Colorado WW2, without being able to build new Colorados as WW2.
It would be great aso for all models of WW1 that have models before and after refitting. Like many modern versions of Missouris and such.
Like having an upgrade to be less costly, but building a new totally out of the case.
Get my drift ??
 
I would like to know if one could make these upgrade, as with Colorado WW1 to Colorado WW2, without being able to build new Colorados as WW2.
It would be great aso for all models of WW1 that have models before and after refitting. Like many modern versions of Missouris and such.
Like having an upgrade to be less costly, but building a new totally out of the case.
Get my drift ??

The obvious answer is to flag the upgrade as a King unit, then it can't be built but you can upgrade to it. The downside is that it will always defend last after all non-king units are killed off.

A work-around I've used is to set a ridiculously high Population Cost for the upgrade (like 255, the maximum pop cost). Then noone could realistically build it from scratch, but upgrading costs no population. The downside here is the annoyance of still seeing it in the city screen as buildable. A possible downside would also be that the AI might start building it anyway despite it having no chance of completing it, but I've never seen that happen myself.
 
Thanks Wolfhart,
I was thinking about the King solution myself, and in this case it might not be too bad. A submarine attack should be faced by lesser ships than a battleship. Cruiser and Destroyer screens around the fleets big ships should perhaps take the first hits.
The pop case have been used in some nice scenarios, but as you say the AI might try to build it.
The jury is still out, so we see.
 
the King solution...

Please don´t forget, that the "King solution" can only be done one time for a unit (upgrading from a normal unit to a king-unit) without coming in trouble with the name of that unit.
If you upgrade your normal Iowa BB to an Iowa BB Korean War version (King unit) and than that unit to an Iowa missile BB (King unit), the Missile Iowa won´t appear with the name Iowa on the map, but with the name of the king unit of that civ (p.e. Lincoln for the USA in a standard game). This is a hardcoded problem of C3C.
 
Please don´t forget, that the "King solution" can only be done one time for a unit (upgrading from a normal unit to a king-unit) without coming in trouble with the name of that unit.
If you upgrade your normal Iowa BB to an Iowa BB Korean War version (King unit) and than that unit to an Iowa missile BB (King unit), the Missile Iowa won´t appear with the name Iowa on the map, but with the name of the king unit of that civ (p.e. Lincoln for the USA in a standard game). This is a hardcoded problem of C3C.

That's strange. I've included several unit line upgrades in my mods over the years as strictly "King" units and haven't ever encounted this problem. They've always upgraded "King" unit to "King" unit without any naming problems.

Back on topic - just an FYI, all the previews for "The Breaking Storm" are now complete and up-to-date! I hope everyone finds them useful and thanks also to Ares for providing excellent templates to work from!
 
Laurana Kanan you have been doing a bang up job on those previews. Currently out and about gallivanting around so no new ships for a little while from my end unless Ares gets some more sounds done. ;)
 
Enjoy the summer, Delta. :) Great job on those previews, Laurana!
Btw, Delta, sent you two boats this morning. Time has been rather scarce since we've had a lot of trouble with my gf's dad who has been in critical condition in the hospital. Now that he's recovering I hope I can get back to the docks. ;) Damn you, real life.
 
Back
Top Bottom