Hi all,
This is my first try at a GOTM in any version of Civ, and first foray into these stratospheric levels. So I went the adventurer route, knowing that I needed the help. Maybe my experience has some value to other newcomers to Civ 4 and GOTM.
Asoka won the space race in 1870. Just as well, as Catherine was overrunning me (20th century military vs. 19th century military is not fun, if you are the 19th!). Brief description of what I think was a reasonable start, but a poor midgame follows, looking for some comments from the experts. But first, some background.
Just started playing Civ 4 earlier this summer. On Civ 3 was about a monarch level player (won some, lost some at that level). Usually play Civ 4 at noble, but with a twist: I go to hotseat, and play against 2 AI that are a team against me. Everyone at Noble for this. I like Bismarck because the granary and forge discounts help me catch up to the double team. Win this about 1 out of 3, if I get good starting resources. Anyone else play this kind of game?
My perusal of the site suggests that early worker-settler sequences may be the best first builds to win. But what I like more as enjoyable gameplay (and isn’t that the point) is to build a second scout (I like good recon), a warrior, and then when the city gets to 3, a worker and then a settler. My thought is that going to workers and settlers early limits pop growth and the early research rate, and I would rather have the growth stagnation occur with a few pop already in the city. I see that the war academy has an article that has done the math (have not digested it all yet) and I am probably wrong. My ususal tech sequence has been to get the techs for tile upgrades, then BW to find the copper, then start mysticism and head for priesthood (eye to ‘henge and Oracle with a wonder speed bonus leader). So I applied that in this game. The results:
4000 BC: Settled in place, with four resources in the fat X. Sent the archers exploring (adventurer start bonuses), researched hunting (I love my scouts).
At 2980 BC: Still just Beijing, pop 4, 10 surplus F, 6 H, settler coming in 1 T, garrisoned by warrior, FB on fish, F on corn, P on cows, M on hill , roads on cow and corn. Worker farming plain 2 E. Map explored to Thebes and to the narrow isthmus in the far SW. Archer at isthmus, scout almost there (one archer lost to a bear). Techs – all back column (except mysticism coming in 7 turns) and AH and archery.
Scores: Hatty 94, Me 101, Khan 114. I was # 1 in pop (48,000 with rival best 21,000), crop yield (18 with RB 13) and GNP (13 with RB 10). 2nd in Mgf goods (RB 7, me at 6). However, 6th in soldiers (RB 25,000 and me 21,000) and 7th in land (RB 28,000 and me 10,000). Was this a good or bad start for the first 1000 years?
By 1870 BC: Had founded Shanghai on the hill 4 E of Beijing, now at pop 3, Barracks coming in 4 T (and in 1 T in Beijing, now pop 6). Had BW by now, but I did not change to slavery to whip away the unhappy pop in Beijing (mistake 1, if not earlier mistakes). Units: 2 workers, 3 archers, 1 warrior). Techs: all column 1, AH, archery, pottery, BW. Working on meditation to priesthood. 2nd in pop (RB 204000 and me 171,000) and in GNP (RB 20 and me 16) but now 5th or worse in all others. Stonehenge is in Beijing (I am a Druid now). Scores: Khan 180, Hatty 180, Me 181. Was this a good or bad place to be after 2000 years?
By 970 BC: Had founded Guangzhou on the hill W of the horses (that were SE of Beijing). Pop 1, P on the horses. Shanghai pop 5 building settler. Beijing pop7 building forge. (Still not whipping, more of mistake 1). Built Oracle in Beijing to get MC. GNP 1st , pop 3rd, all else 5th or worse. Units: worker 2, archer 3, warrior 1, axe 2, spear 1 (thinking of Hatty’s war chariots). Techs: All col 1, all col 2 x Poly, all col 3 X Mono, and MC. Scores: Hatty 251, Khan 279, Me 280, Asoka 283. Good or bad place to be?
By 20 AD: Had founded Nanjing (now pop 2) 1 SE of the Gems on the coast (gems and 3 sugar in the fat X). At war with Hatty and Khan (mistake 2: Asoka at war with Khan asked me to declare on Khan, thought I should keep the leader happy, then Asoka made peace next turn!). I had declared on Hatty and taken Pi Rameses (1 S of the cow that is 2 SW of Nanjing) pop 2 with 2 rebellion turns to go. Guangzhou pop 7, Shanghai pop 6, Beijing pop 10 all happy. Had founded Xian 4 N of Beijing to get the crabs for health (pop 2) (Was this mistake 3, as it built at a snails pace, with few hammers? Better to have built to the island?). Units: worker 2, archer 3, horse archer 3, warrior 1, axe 6, spear 3. Techs: All of cols 1, 2, and 3; MC, writing, monarchy. Now 1 in pop, 2 in GNP, 2 in MFG, 6 in crops, 7 in land and soldiers (215,000 RB and me 106,000). Beijing now had ‘henge, Oracle, Colossus, and Parth wonders. Scores: Khan 501, Hatty 504, Asoka 507 and me 511.
Tech race: Asoka had math, alph, IW that I did not. I had Monarchy, H Ride, and MC that he did not. I failed to start trading techs at this point: mistake 4 and the fatal one, as I think the game was winnable from this position. I also had to make peace with Hatty after later taking Alexandria (4 E of my horses in Guangzhou [in banana land]) because Khan was coming with troops. I never gave Hatty a death blow (mistake 5)
By 1025 AD: what a difference the dark ages make! For starters, scores are Khan 789, Me 935, Capac 984, Hatty 1001, Asoka 1086, Catherine 1221. I am 6 techs behind (drama music, CS, Phil, Optics, Eng and that’s just the ones I can see!), except I am six techs ahead of Khan. I have 7 cities, and the leaders have 13 or 14. Goal now is just to survive to the end.
By 1298 AD: Scores are now Khan 1068, Me 1137, Hatty 1293, Capac 1302, Asoka 1399, Catherine 1517. Still behind by drama, music, phil, paper, bank, eng, optics (that I can see). I do have GPowder that some do not and I traded for some techs (did the same later with steel), but never caught up on techs. Up to 8 cities.
By 1577 AD: Scores are now Khan 1340, Cyrus 1556, Me 1673, Hatty 1693, Capac 1815, Asoka 1918 and Cath 2054. I am thinking that at least I can keep this respectable (wrong!). Behind by Constit, Liberal, Econ, SMeth, Rep Parts (that I can see). I am up to 11 cities, but they have about 16 each at the top.
By 1700 AD: My high water mark. Scores are Khan 1525, Me 1862, Cyrus, 1867, Hatty 1884, Capac 2057, Asoka 2406, Cath 2543. Behind by Democ, Corp, SMeth, Rep parts. Now up to 13 cities. Still thinking I might come in third. However, I am last in soldiers (Rbest 1,082,000 Rave 864166, Rworst 655,000 and me 614,000), and the wars are coming …
1850 AD: I am dying on the vine. Since our last episode, Capac declared war, dropped about a dozen SAM inf and art on the treasure island, sailed up a destroyer to kill my galley ferry so I could not reinforce, and took both cities there. Hatty decided that was a good time to declare war on me as well. Held off Hatty in the SW but then Asoka declared war. Made peace with Capac for a tech, peace with Hatty for her getting Alexandria back. Asoka came in with gunships and just chewed me up. If I wanted to survive, I had to make peace at the cost of Shanghai (after other cities fell). Then Catherine declared. She took Beijing with marines, and another city. Peace cost yet another. I had just gotten to railroads and had a handful of MGs, but tanks and GShips were upon me. Scores: Me 1364, Khan 1993, Hatty 2548, Cyrus 2576, Capac 2899, Asoka 3564, Cath 3583. Behind by commun, physics, bio, combust, ALine (that I can see). I am down to 5 cities. The space race is on, so the pain will be over soon.
1870 AD, the final tableau: Asoka wins the space race. Maybe my last war with Catherine kept her from winning. A revolt occurred in Beijing, and it was held with only two units. I had rail lines built, and moved the few troops I had left to retake it, knowing that the game was almost over. I wanted to die in my own capital. Final scores: Me 1462, Khan 2129, Hatty 2728, Cyrus 2729, Capac 3142, Cath 3570, 3825. I ended with 5 cities (Catherine took a couple others after I retook Beijing).
An ugly ending after what I though was not a bad start. Or maybe I was deluding myself? I would love to know what the experts think: was I doomed from the start, or did I screw up at 20AD?
I downloaded the start file at 10 PM on 9/27, and played this in 12:33. Next game I will have to be more deliberative.
da_Vinci (or should I say, da vanquised?)