European Diplomacy Three- True World War
- Thread starter Tasslehoff
- Start date
From: First Chairman Nao Zedong
To: The world
We regret that matters have come to this, but there was no alternative. The instability on the African continent risked cause an imbalance that certain rogue opportunistic factions could easily have taken advantage of, had we allowed to let the situation escalate. The issue of where the blame lies for the African instabilities is irrelevant in the face of the greater threat to the world community. China has together with their European allies taken the hard, but necessary, steps to ensure that Africa does not risk being overrun by barbaric forces.
To: Australia
Cease your trade with us if you so dearly desire it. You would lose more than we would.
{ Why am I listed as not trading with SSSR? And why are not SSSR and Europe trading in either direction? }
To: The world
We regret that matters have come to this, but there was no alternative. The instability on the African continent risked cause an imbalance that certain rogue opportunistic factions could easily have taken advantage of, had we allowed to let the situation escalate. The issue of where the blame lies for the African instabilities is irrelevant in the face of the greater threat to the world community. China has together with their European allies taken the hard, but necessary, steps to ensure that Africa does not risk being overrun by barbaric forces.
To: Australia
Cease your trade with us if you so dearly desire it. You would lose more than we would.
{ Why am I listed as not trading with SSSR? And why are not SSSR and Europe trading in either direction? }
Ekolite
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2007
- Messages
- 5,451
Yes do so, I wanted you to provoke him into a war, so he could ground you into the dirt, its always better to have a reason to go to war other then just plain old greed, the world is watching you know. I wasn't expecting him to attack this turn. Must have been a misunderstanding on his part. I suggest you refrain from attempting to blackmail me in future.
*Clears Throat*
Alright I have several pm's from Kol.7 warning me of Quebec's attack so I wouldn't attack him:
(unfortunately I deleted the others in an attempt to reduce my in box)
That statement above was not doctored except for the bolding. If you do not believe that I was warned by another who spied on Quebec and warned me of the attack:
There is my reasoning for the war.
Alright I have several pm's from Kol.7 warning me of Quebec's attack so I wouldn't attack him:
(unfortunately I deleted the others in an attempt to reduce my in box)
That statement above was not doctored except for the bolding. If you do not believe that I was warned by another who spied on Quebec and warned me of the attack:
There is my reasoning for the war.
Ekolite
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2007
- Messages
- 5,451
Yes, that PM is correct.
However, he is attempting to convince you by theory of association. Ie. Post one PM and say there were more; because this PM is real, the idea is that people will believe there were other real ones too, which is not true. Surely, you would have kept something that would imply I am betraying my allies? Don't make me laugh!
I was afraid that merciary would try to take advantage of weakly defended Chile and become to powerful for D'art to handle. So I accelrated things a bit to stop him from having that chance.
However, he is attempting to convince you by theory of association. Ie. Post one PM and say there were more; because this PM is real, the idea is that people will believe there were other real ones too, which is not true. Surely, you would have kept something that would imply I am betraying my allies? Don't make me laugh!
I was afraid that merciary would try to take advantage of weakly defended Chile and become to powerful for D'art to handle. So I accelrated things a bit to stop him from having that chance.
Izipo
Hardcore casual gamer
Look, S. Africa, he's talking about you.
I love you too, darlin'.
In any case:
From: President LightFang of South Africa
To: Kol.7 of Australia
CC: The World (yes, even Mali)
On what grounds do you reject our trade with Chile? We will trade with all signatories of the Treaty of International Trade. Chile is in fact still able to sign this treaty should they wish. If they will sign it, we will trade. If you leave the Treaty of International Trade because of that, well, that is your loss then.
Ekolite
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2007
- Messages
- 5,451
I don't intend to leave the international trade agreement at all. But a treaty is just a treaty, nothing special and nothing binding, as has been proved countless times by the general ignoring of treaties. I have decided that you people can do as you wish, I will not act to stop you. However, I still urge people to see this from my point of view, the Chileans are unfit to rule themselves, they were planning on invading me - something I do not respond kindly to. I hope people won't trade with them, what you would gain is pitance - hardly worth it. And you can bet I'll remember the people who do.
Leeksoup
Pope Lazius
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 130
Yes, Chile will sign any document with anyone that enables us to trade. In fact, I hereby sign any and all trade agreements anyone wishes to proffer. There.
Also, President Kol, I do hope you realize that the Chilean people totally agreed with you- their ruler was unfit to rule. That's why I'm here- I'm his replacement. Tada.
If you say that all South Americans anywhere are unfit for rule, that's an entirely different statement that Mexico may have problems with.
Also, President Kol, I do hope you realize that the Chilean people totally agreed with you- their ruler was unfit to rule. That's why I'm here- I'm his replacement. Tada.
If you say that all South Americans anywhere are unfit for rule, that's an entirely different statement that Mexico may have problems with.
Tasslehoff
Kender
In answer to questions:
Red dots mean the city has been attacked last turn. New units in those cities receive penalties in battle.
No, Chi shouldn't be Australian (yet). Your attacking force captured the territory, making it neutral. Then, before battles began in the second turn, it became Australian, but was recaptured, becoming neutral once again. Before it was attacked this turn, it became Chilean, but was then re-re-captured, by you, making it neutral. There, that's my reasoning
Niklas- you and the SSSR not trading was just mistyped. I had added the extra income. The lack of Russia-Europe trade is because of the lack of a formal peace treaty. Neither side asked to make peace in orders, and neither side wrote/agreed to a public peace treaty, therefore peace and trade don't yet exist.
Red dots mean the city has been attacked last turn. New units in those cities receive penalties in battle.
No, Chi shouldn't be Australian (yet). Your attacking force captured the territory, making it neutral. Then, before battles began in the second turn, it became Australian, but was recaptured, becoming neutral once again. Before it was attacked this turn, it became Chilean, but was then re-re-captured, by you, making it neutral. There, that's my reasoning
Niklas- you and the SSSR not trading was just mistyped. I had added the extra income. The lack of Russia-Europe trade is because of the lack of a formal peace treaty. Neither side asked to make peace in orders, and neither side wrote/agreed to a public peace treaty, therefore peace and trade don't yet exist.
Backwards Logic
Emperor Palpatine
Whoa, I said in my orders to trade with SSSR. That should imply peace, no? Why would I trade with someone I'm still at war with, especially when they would have gained more than I would through mutual trade?
Frozen In Ice
Emperor
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2007
- Messages
- 1,536
I guess we'll just have to make a formal peace then.
Treaty of Moscow
1. SSSR and Europe agree to peace at the current borders.
2. SSSR and Europe agree to trade whenever possible.
Signed,
Frozen In Ice, Ruler of SSSR
______________________
Treaty of Moscow
1. SSSR and Europe agree to peace at the current borders.
2. SSSR and Europe agree to trade whenever possible.
Signed,
Frozen In Ice, Ruler of SSSR
______________________
Backwards Logic
Emperor Palpatine
I guess we'll just have to make a formal peace then.
Treaty of Moscow
1. SSSR and Europe agree to peace at the current borders.
2. SSSR and Europe agree to trade whenever possible.
Signed,
Frozen In Ice, Ruler of SSSR
The European Prime Minister
Treaty of Moscow
1. SSSR and Europe agree to peace at the current borders.
2. SSSR and Europe agree to trade whenever possible.
Signed,
Frozen In Ice, Ruler of SSSR
The European Prime Minister
