Imperium Offtopicum - UN Building

Claims Court Case XXVIII: Marian Empire's Claims on Central America, Cameroon, and the remainder of the Netherlands



Details: The Marian Empire wishes to seize Central America(not much considering the annexation of Mexico), and will build an alternative to the Panama Canal here to increase the options available to trading nations. For historical reasons, and the pending annexation of Nigeria, the Marian Empire seeks Cameroon. Finally, the Marian Empire wishes to claim the last remnants of the Netherlands, to re-unify the Dutch people and also weaken the LSP Party's base.

Votes:

7 for (Marian Empire, Zelalta, Choxorn, Carthagistan, Israel, CCCP, Pirates)
 
Also. Can anyone give me a rundown of Peronland's votes again? Before I sort it...
 
I vote yes on the Marian Empire claims.

Btw I voted no on Peronland

I would like to claim, Greenland (Its big but, theres nothing there :P) and also perhaps Republic of the Congo, (note: not Democratic Republic of the Congo ;) ) and Svalbard,(only natural..)
 
I'm pretty sure I already voted YES on Israel, but I'll do it again.

I'll vote YES on Marian's claims if they vote YES on mine.
 
If anyone will vote YES to my claim, I'll automatically vote for theirs. I can't keep up with all the different cases, so you can just count someone saying YES to my claim as me saying YES to their claim, Tanicius.
 
I vote YES to Zelet, choxorn, Droopy, and the Marian Empire.
 
Unless the UN objects, I will be increasing the amount of pixels at stake per battle from 10 to 20, to make battles faster.
 
CarthageFlag.png


CARTHAGISTAN CLAIMS BRAZIL

Also, can we get a response from our honourable GM on the Congress of Sydney? (Note that New South Wales have been turned over to Carthagistani control)

Also, we vote YES on Choxornese, Israeli and Marian claims.
 
CarthageFlag.png


CARTHAGISTAN CLAIMS BRAZIL

Perónia protests this claim, as it threatens Peróntine national security. If you press ahead with these claims, there will be dire consequences.
 
Perónia protests this claim, as it threatens Peróntine national security. If you press ahead with these claims, there will be dire consequences.

How does it threaten Peronian national security? We have never said anything against Peronia while you guys continually view us as enemies. We'd be quite justified to say that the reality is the other way around, that Peronia is a threat to our security.
 
How does it threaten Peronian national security?
Because it removes the independant Brazilian buffer state.

We have never said anything against Peronia while you guys continually view us as enemies. We'd be quite justified to say that the reality is the other way around, that Peronia is a threat to our security.
This is the first time Perónia has ever viewed Carthagistan as a threat to our national security. The only other time a situation could be stretched to say that Perónia viewed Carthagistan as an enemy was when we voted against your Mexico claims, which was soley to protect Latin American integrity. In fact, Perónia has been supportive of Carthagistan in all other matters.
 
Alright, after an era of mismanagement on my part, I have revisited this trainwreck for the sake of all you little monsters.

I'm tallying up the votes for Peronland now to get that finally settled... will add those cases immediately afterward...

I'm also a little irritable at the moment, so anybody who prods too much is liable to be eaten...

...You know, the usual. :)
 
I tallied 1 for and 3 against... nobody voted in favor of Peronia besides themselves? :confused:
 
Claims Court Case XXIX: CSA's Claims to the Rest of the Former United States

Details: Self-explanatory
 
Back
Top Bottom