OOC: Yeah, moralist politics are quite a bit of a wedge. The problem is that PADA very well could be a discussion area for moralists and non-moralists alike. However many moralists are following the lead of Brazil and leaving, which threatens to turn PADA into an echo chamber devoid of opposing beliefs.
For myself, Vinland's quite wary of moralism, although our views have ranged between labeling it as a huge threat to democracy, and trying to engage in dialogue with it to repair bridges that were damaged after the Jamaica Affair and the withdrawal of Brazil from the organization. PADA's been in a state of crisis/indecision since that, trying to find its footing. There's a sense that many PADA members joined for a sense of security, rather than for the ideological goals of its founders. In the present state of the world, the threat of foreign intervention into the Americas seems highly unlikely, leaving PADA to debate how vigorously it should apply its doctrine of democratization.
It's all quite funny, really, it seems that PADA can't get a break. When Brazil was in it, we were perceived as Brazilian hangers-on and tools of Rio's foreign policy. When Brazil left, mistaken conceptions changed in the blink of an eye, ending up little more accurate and equally negative.
With the departure of several Latin American nations, I suspect that PADA might be increasingly viewed as an organization of new world protestants, which might be a further wedge in the organization. I'd argue that this is incorrect, but as you noted, popular perception is critical.
Also what do you mean by hagiography in this context? It seems that you are referring to PADA as a religion, with its tenets as metaphorical saints.