Kozmos
Jew Detective
Don't judge me for being a redneck. That fact doesn't stop me from being a die-hard Christian. ~redneckbadger91
Smidgey said:If theism is the belief in a creator, or first cause, who is ultimately responsible for one's own existence, then God is an atheist. He believes himself to have existed eternally -- though, as Kant suggested, even God must occassionally wonder where he came from.
I don't know what is your assignment that your teacher purpose here,but it does have(stating the obvious) a minor,major premise and a conclusion.Is this a hypothetical question that you are asking or formal?Are you asking me to match up or conclude that it is not a predicate calculus?Fifty said:I don't understand what's wrong with it? Seriously could you explain it to me because I'm taking a logic class now so this crap interests me.
1. P--->V
2. F--->P
Therefore, F--->V 1,2,H.S.
1. F--->V
2. T--->F
Therefore, T--->V 1,2,H.S.
CivGeneral said:I do not wish to think for myself.
CivGeneral said:The scientific method is just garbage and just another tool to bring down God and the Church.
That statement does not apply to them because they go around and bash God and offend other people of other faiths who do believe in God.
CivGeneral said:I do not wish to think for myself. Thinking for one's self leads to Blasphemy, Apostasy, and Heresy against the Church and God.
Who has told you that this is part of Catholic doctrine? Or did you arrive at these opinions by yourself? Because both of these statements are shockingly at odds with Catholic thought, not to mention with humanist thought.The scientific method is just garbage and just another tool to bring down God and the Church.
I dont know, I am just confused on what to say. I did not arrived at these options by myself, it was just an ouburst of anger whenever I am confrunted.Taliesin said:Who has told you that this is part of Catholic doctrine? Or did you arrive at these opinions by yourself? Because both of these statements are shockingly at odds with Catholic thought, not to mention with humanist thought.
Ah. No great worries, then. Just take a deep breath and stop posting for a few minutes.CivGeneral said:I dont know, I am just confused on what to say. I did not arrived at these options by myself, it was just an ouburst of anger whenever I am confrunted.![]()
Sounds like a person who is fond of the heirarchy.cgannon64 said:Beings worship the highest being possible. (Important to note: Not simply the being above them in the ladder, but the highest being, always. This is why we don't worship angels.) God is the highest being possible. Thus, God does not worship anyone but himself. (Also to note: Worship is the wrong word in this case.)
cgannon64 said:Beings worship the highest being possible. (Important to note: Not simply the being above them in the ladder, but the highest being, always. This is why we don't worship angels.) God is the highest being possible. Thus, God does not worship anyone but himself. (Also to note: Worship is the wrong word in this case.)
There is no catch-22.
Taliesin said:Is this meaningful, non-trivial, or the slightest bit relevant to anything?
Taliesin said:An atheist: one who does not believe any higher power exists.
God: the highest power.
Would it make sense for God to believe that a higher power than Him exists? Obviously not. Does that mean He satisfies the definition of "atheist"? Yes. Is this meaningful, non-trivial, or the slightest bit relevant to anything? No. End of topic.
Beings worship the highest being possible.
Taliesin said:An atheist: one who does not believe any higher power exists.
God: the highest power.
Would it make sense for God to believe that a higher power than Him exists? Obviously not. Does that mean He satisfies the definition of "atheist"? Yes. Is this meaningful, non-trivial, or the slightest bit relevant to anything? No. End of topic.
Would it make sense for God to believe that a higher power than Him exists? Obviously not.