White House Asks Court to Void POW Award

Capulet

RESTART
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
4,092
White House Asks Court to Void POW Award
52 minutes ago Add White House - AP Cabinet & State to My Yahoo!


By JENNIFER C. KERR, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration urged an appeals court Wednesday to overturn a judge's order awarding nearly $1 billion in Iraqi money to 17 Americans taken prisoner by Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s government during the 1991 Persian Gulf War (news - web sites).

Attorneys for the POWs, who were tortured and starved, countered that the award — to be paid from Iraqi government assets frozen in this country — in no way threatens the rebuilding of Iraq (news - web sites), taking issue with the central argument of the administration.


Justice Department (news - web sites) attorney Gregory Katsas said that foreign policy interests are at stake, and that the POWs' claims should be handled through diplomatic channels rather than the courts.


The administration maintains that countless people suffered at the hands of Saddam and plenty will be seeking compensation from the new government, jeopardizing its fragile existence. Once the Iraqi government gets on more solid footing, the administration believes reparations could be negotiated.


Stewart Baker, attorney for the POWs, told a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that his clients simply want the judgment in their favor upheld to affirm their suffering and allow them to collect at a later time.


"French oil companies are going to walk in and say 'I have a contract signed by Saddam Hussein and I want to be paid,' and they're going to have a claim that is recognized under international law," Baker said outside court. "We think this is a debt incurred by Saddam Hussein that deserves much more priority than some French oil contract."


Ret. Col. David Eberly, who was held by the Iraqis for more than 40 days, said the government's effort to void the ruling is disappointing.


"Today, the argument boils down to the fact that the government simply wants to say 'thank you very much for your service and now go home and live forever the horrors and the memories of your captivity and the torture that went on.'" he said. "I think that's unjust."


Eberly was shot down over northwest Iraq on Jan. 19, 1991, and captured by Iraqi soldiers who beat him daily and fed him just bread and broth.


The POWs filed suit against Iraq in April 2002 under a 1996 law that allows victims to pursue blocked assets if they've won damage awards against foreign governments that sponsor terrorism.


U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts sided with the POWs last summer and ordered payment of $653 million in compensatory damages and $306 million in punitive damages.


But the Justice Department stepped in and said the POWs could not have access to any of the $1.7 billion of Iraqi assets frozen in 1990. It argued that President Bush (news - web sites) formally seized those assets after the invasion of Iraq last year and that the money would be used for rebuilding the country. Judge Roberts reluctantly agreed that the government had the right to block those funds from being used.

Now do these guys really need this much money? US prisoners taken capture during Vietnam weren't awarded with this much money, neither were WWII POWs. So why do they need this money? They should just be glad that they're alive.
 
If they get a billion, how much should be paid to guys like Senator McCain, who spent 7 years as a POW in Vietnam? A trillion? :rolleyes:
 
Wow, I've actually agreed with dumb pothead about something :)
 
Given the circumstances I can understand why they would want to not pay. If we had not gone to war against Iraq and destroyed the government I would have agreed that they should pay and that they were getting off easy.

Maybe Bush just wants to block this so that when the inocents in Guantanamo bay sue the US we can use that case as some sort of precedent;).
 
Originally posted by Musa
Wow, I've actually agreed with dumb pothead about something :)
I feel warm and fuzzy. Well, fuzzy anyway;) (goes to raise the thermostat)
 
Well, for once they are right.
 
Heh. As if the survival of Iraq's new government had anything to do with it. It's not even as simple as wanting that billion dollars for Halliburton et al.

My money says that Bush & Co. have already absconded with Iraq's treasury, and don't want anyone coming to collect until the money is safely hidden and unaccounted for.
 
AFAIK, they were captured by the PREVIOUS government, right ?

Why this one should pay ? :confused:
 
POWs are inherently connected to war; it's one of the risks of being a soldier. Awarding them so much money doesn't make sense. In fact, sometimes getting caught is due to the soldier's own stupidity.
Then again, I must admit it's easy for me to judge them from my save house, far from the hell called Iraq.
 
Umm-of course the French and Russians might say that that is their money, and they have a prior claim.

More decisions like this will merely hasten the outflow of foreign capital from the USA.
 
Originally posted by GrandMasta Nick
Maybe Bush just wants to block this so that when the inocents in Guantanamo bay sue the US we can use that case as some sort of precedent;).
Or maybe your just a bushbashing dumbass who turns everything in to "blah, blah, Bush sucks."
 
Top Bottom