PrimoXanthous
~ knightmare13 ~
what political sensitivities?I would like to see Israel too, but highly doubt it would ever make it in due to political sensitivities.
what political sensitivities?I would like to see Israel too, but highly doubt it would ever make it in due to political sensitivities.
Also Brennan listedGermany's road to FranceBelgium twice.
what political sensitivities?
Because the Inuit were never great world leaders, and certainly not to the extent that the Arabs were.
I didn't Really understand but, you're saying that the possibility of having Modern Civ in the game are less??The Arab world isn't too keen on Israel for a variety of reasons, some of which are quite legitimate. This isn't the thread to go into specifics but basically such an inclusion would cause more of a stir in the media than one would expect 2K Games to deal with. You've got a similar problem with Tibet and how that could potentially get the game banned in the most populous country in the world.
They might be able to get away with ancient Israel but speaking personally I wouldn't be happy with an Israel that doesn't at least give a nod to the modern variant, IE when the country is actually a power of some influence rather than "that one area that got conquered a whole bunch by everybody".
Are you aware of the Arab-Israeli conflict and the controversy over the status of Israel as a state? If you're not, go read it up. That's what I meant by political sensitivities.I didn't Really understand but, you're saying that the possibility of having Modern Civ in the game are less??
yeah i know that, but who the hell care about that war/conflict, this is just a game. whats wrong with having Israel in the Game, their cool, they got their mark in history just like any other Civ. Just sayin.. .Are you aware of the Arab-Israeli conflict and the controversy over the status of Israel as a state? If you're not, go read it up. That's what I meant by political sensitivities.
Because the Inuit were never great world leaders, and certainly not to the extent that the Arabs were.
I don't think Mexico is a good option, We already got Aztecs in the game, adding Mexico is like adding Great Britain out of Celts and England, Holy Roman Empire out of Germany and France, Iran out of Persia, Iraq out of Babylonia. i mean they are just the same Group of people, Just the past of it and the present. We got a lot more options. Maybe Argentinian Civ (or any Civ who settle on the Southern part of South America) could fill out the empty spot in South America.Mexico, because the spanish speaking latin american civ must be filled (after Brazil opened the post colonial civ spot) Mexico is very recognizable and has very interesting flavour to use, and even tho Im biased, both Argentina and Colombia could work as well. I dont want to see either Canada or Australia because I think there should be just one post colonial for each colonial empire: England-America, Portugal-Brazil, Spain-Mexico.
yeah i know that, but who the hell care about that war/conflict, this is just a game. whats wrong with having Israel in the Game, their cool, they got their mark in history just like any other Civ. Just sayin.. .
We have Civs and a wonder that make desert tiles better. Why not a Civ that makes snow tiles somewhat useful and tundra tiles better?
I don't think Mexico is a good option, We already got Aztecs in the game, adding Mexico is like adding Great Britain out of Celts and England, Holy Roman Empire out of Germany and France, Iran out of Persia, Iraq out of Babylonia. i mean they are just the same Group of people, Just the past of it and the present. We got a lot more options. Maybe Argentinian Civ (or any Civ who settle on the Southern part of South America) could fill out the empty spot in South America.