Vatican Cracks down on Gay behaviour

Not for Catholisism or forthe Pope(especially not for the latter) but I do support anything against gays(within reason).
 
It's not a new thing. The Vatican has had this ruling for a long time. They just re-affirming their stand on on gay men who want to join the seminary.
Whether seminaries itself would enforce this ruling on would-be seminarians is another issue.

Celibacy is one of the vows they take to join the priesthood. It applies to both gay or straight men. If they aren't sure that they can control their sexual urges and remain celibate, then they should'nt join the priesthood.
 
Back In Black said:
Not for Catholisism or forthe Pope(especially not for the latter) but I do support anything against gays(within reason).
You know, if you said "I do support anything against Blacks", you would be called a racist.

What should we call you?
 
DeLorimier, if you do not support everything against gays, Back in Black's freedom to sleep with women dies. It's that simple.
 
You'd think they'd lay off already. They dress Liberace and all of the women in their lives are sisters and mothers. The Vatican sends a lot of mixed messages.
 
I think he should be more worried about potential then freedom judging by his views.
 
Cruel world indeed.
 
This is perfect. They blame gays for their own problem. Typical excusists. What if they let priests have sex? Then maybe they wouldn't molest kids! Then again, they're a faith-based institution. Écraser l'infâme!
 
What you think you know better than the pope?? (im not aruguing just saying a movie, quote anyway anyone can guess where its from)
 
oh bog. delete
 
So the essence of this decision appears to be "If you're shagging men, you won't cope with celibacy, so first you need to prove you can. But if you're shagging women, you'll have no problem with celibacy, so come on in." Is this actually an indication by the vatican that homosexual sex is more fun, as they've now decreed it's harder to give up?
 
Why do all these Vatican threads have thinly disguised sexually-rlated puns in the title? :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom