[MOD] Ultimate Strategy

naf4ever · Mar 5, 2006

Mod – Ultimate Strategy
release version .48 w/ alternative tech trading model

Current Status:

Version .48 is out. It contains a few more bug fixes, refinement of the free specialist for creative trait and a few other minor tweaks. - 04/29/06
Im starting up grad school soon and wont have a lot of time to keep doing this mod unfortunetly. I've enjoyed it a lot but im putting this mod on hold for the time being. - 04/04/06
A better explanation of how some of the new features work along with more pictures have been added below. - 04/04/06

Currently Working on:

Adding more variety and differences between the civics and traits.
Contemplating how to create and maybe add a cruise missle unit. This isnt for sure though.

Here are some pics and explanations of the new features added:

The new Medicinal Herbs resource gives all your units increased healing and a slight combat bonus from maintaining better health.

Salt is one of the oldest preservatives around. Here it gives an increase to food yield in all your cities.

The Coffee resource does nothing on its own but allows you to build the powerful Coffee House building. As you can see it increases happiness and the caffiene fix helps to boost productivity and commerce.

I added the super-cool PlotList enhancement by 12monkeys. It lets you manage stacks of units much better and apply all sorts of filters to them. Check out the readme on it for details on how to customize it.

I borrowed the slavery model from Kael's Fall from Heaven. You have a 1 in 4 chance to capture slaves when you win a battle in that civic. The slave units can then be used as moderate workers or sac'd to slightly increase production of a building or wonder.

All units will now receive this bonus when you are in the "Nationhood" civic as long as they are in your own territory. Excludes boats and helicopters.

Watermills and workshops have gotten much needed upgrades. They will now give a bonus to your city based on how many of them are being worked within the city radius. This pictures shows an example. Workshops give a bonus to production, watermills to gold. Read the version notes for more information on them.

Standard tech trading (swapping techs) has been disabled in this mod. It is replaced with a unique technology transfer bonus instead that is based on open border treaties. For example in the above picture you can engage in a "technology transfer" by researching any of the techs under the "Has available for trade" section. The catch is you just have to be trading with them, hence have an open borders treaty with that person. They will also get this bonus from you when they are researching the appropriate techs so be cautious to whom you give treaties.

This is the technology transfer bonus you then get if you are researching a tech that someone you have an open borders treaty with already has. This replacement to tech swapping basically symbolizes things like merchants bringing back knowledge from far away lands, trade and commerce that gives exposure to new technologies and ideas, etc...

The new early era scout/spy available at writing.

Additional Changes:

A number of the civics have been changed around to become more useful, especially the labor ones.
Weak and underused units and buildings have been tweaked and improved.
Some of the traits have undergone changes. Industrial now gives +1 hammer on squares already producing 3 or more instead of the wonder bonus. Creative leaders now receive a free artist in all cities size 12 or greater.

Other Features:

The purpose of this mod is to take a very analytical look at vanilla civ and then proceed to balance out numerous issues with the goal of adding strategy, variety and fun to the game especially in regards to competitive multiplayer games. In addition I loved playing the current mods out there already yet most of the time was wishing there was one that combined certain elements from one mod with the unique features of another while maintaining game balance and fun. It is my hope this mod does this. Furthermore every major change or addition to this mod along with the reasoning behind it will be detailed in the Alteration Analysis that you can download and look at. The goal of this is to put these changes to public scrutiny and examination in order to encourage lively debate with the purpose of generating more well thought out ideas for improving the game.

Big thanks to Sevo for letting me borrow some of his python code to get me started with and whose mod is still one of my favorites and inspired me to make this one.

Downloads:
Alteration Analysis - Being re-done
Ultimate Strategy mod v.48 hosted on FileFront - 11 megs (If you're having problems downloading it pick a different download server from their list.)

To install simply extract the .zip file to your Civilization 4\Mods directory. Then in the main menu choose "Advanced" and "Load a Mod" then pick Ultimate Strategy.

To install a patch simply extract the .zip file to you Civilization 4\Mods directory EXACTLY as you did when you installed the mod to begin with.

Version Notes:
Click the spoiler button to see all the changes in the game in relation to basic civilization 4.

Spoiler :

naf4ever · Mar 5, 2006

FAQ:
Q: What is different about this mod than the others that add new units and wonders?
First off any alterations are made with multiplayer in mind above all else. This is because humans can exploit unbalances with greater efficiency than the AI. Secondly because of all the analysis and public scrutiny implemented changes will undergo I think you'll find that this mod plays very well in terms of game balance and added strategy especially in competitive multiplayer games. Emphasis is being put on adding to the game strategically without obsoleting anything currently in the game.

Q: Why are you posting the entire thought process in the alteration analysis text in regards to the reasoning behind every single alteration or addition to the game?
Because I want your help. Any major changes that I introduce will be posted on the detailed Alteration Analysis along with their justifications. If after playing you feel the new alterations aren't appropriate or don't match up with my stated goals you can then dissect the original reasoning for its change in the first place and challenge it and contribute toward making the mod better.

Q: Why do you have strict written out goals and methodologies for altering or adding new content in this mod?
Because I've found that most mods people create start out wonderfully then fall victim to feature and content creep. Also on some level people have a play style they prefer and whether they realize it or not seem to implement changes which correspond to their preferred style. I myself am guilty of this sometimes without even realizing it. But by having a strict set of written out guidelines and methodology for adding in new units and content it helps prevent this from happening and keeps the game more balanced over time as more features are added or changed.

Q: Why haven't you added more “Lost Units” like all the other mods and/or more wonders/buildings/resources in general?
Because once again adding lots of new units without a specific goal or purpose actually weakens the game in my opinion. Example: Every mod out there I see has added a 5 strength cataphract and a 4 strength hypaspist. These are units which I've never seen a human player build in a multiplayer game because in their current state they are downright useless. The AI will build them though. They will build these instead of building more useful units and as result the game is now easier as you have an AI building gimped units no human would even consider building. Its this sort of situation I'm trying to avoid. I'm more focused on adding new content that is useful and meaningful instead of just large in quanitity.

Q: Your fanatic preoccupation with all these rules and analysis seems a bit obsessive. What gives?
Well, thats just me. I understand this mod might not be for everyone but I think those seeking a more balanced and more strategic game especially in multiplayer or at higher AI levels will enjoy it greatly.

Goals of this mod in order of importance:

To improve balance, strategy, variety and fun by altering current content in the game.
To improve balance, strategy, variety and fun by adding new content to the game.
To add new content to the game in order to increase strategy, variety and enjoyment provided it is in harmony and doesn't conflict with goals 1 or 2.

General methodology followed for altering or adding new content to this mod:

A logical line of reasoning should be used to justify the changes or additions such as how the change will fix a current imbalance or add more strategy and variety.
Game balance issues will then be considered above all else.
- Game balance in multiplayer will take precedent over single player.
- Following multiplayer the A.I. levels of monarch and/or emperor will then be used as a base for the rest of the changes.
Historical accuracy will be used where applicable to back up logical justifications but will always take a back seat to game balance issues.

Special methodology followed for altering or adding new units:

Alterations or additions should not drastically diminish the value of, obsolete or significantly speed up the obsolescence of current units. Example: I originally wanted to add the Mark V world war I tank (power 20, pincher promotion, at assembly line) in this mod. But it violates this goal as it ends up being more powerful than regular tanks versus infantry (with the pincher promotion) and results in greatly devaluing the regular tank at industrialism. This is the same reason why I left out many of the other units from the Lost Units mod such as the ship-of-the-line, bi-plane, etc...
Major alterations or additions should have a specific purpose. In essence no new units will be added simply because they can. The purpose should be to either:
- Correct current imbalances in the game or,
- To increase strategy by adding more variety to combat.
Unit power and abilities should be balanced in relation to required resources, existing units of the same level and tech requirements.
- Units made available at a dead end tech can be made slightly more powerful than those made available on a required tech of approximately the same level.
- When increasing unit strength emphasis should first be put on specific areas (such as city defense or bonuses against a certain type of unit) because raw increases in power tend to cause imbalances more.
- Units requiring resources should be noticeably more powerful than those without. Unique units are an exception.

Methodology followed for altering or adding new buildings, wonders, civics, religions and everything else:

This area is more open and while I don't have a set structure as guidelines that I follow I tend to abide by the general methodology for altering or adding new content to the game listed above. Furthermore I tend to follow this main assumption: Everything is related to everything.

Example: Increasing or decreasing happiness in one area inevitably increases or decreases the value of everything else in the game which also affects happiness such as civics, resources, other buildings, the culture slider etc.. The same for health. Another example is yields. I have not added a third tier production building after the factory in this mod even though every other one out there does. I didn't do this because keeping this assumption in mind adding more production capability diminishes the usefulness of the police state and organized religion civic. It makes workshops pointless and allows people to maintain high commerce in universal suffrage while also maintaining high production. It in essence allows them to have their cake and eat it to. This takes away strategy I believe as it takes away the hard decisions from the game.

I try to apply this thinking and line of reasoning to all major changes or additions I make in the game and please try to keep it in mind when suggesting changes or alterations yourself: Everything is related to everything.

Enjoy the mod and please post any feedback about the game play or bugs.

-Naf

__________________________________

Credits:

Naf4ever (me!):

Creative trait enhancement
OpenTech technology trading model
Implemention of the workshop watermill improvement
Nationalist/Nationhood promotion
Unique resource effects

Sevo: For loaning me his python and helping me out some with it.

Sevolopedia
City Screen Commerce Display
Python merging

Frontbrecher:

Lost Wonders
Lost Units

Bhruic:

CulturalDecay
RealFort
TechConquest

SupremeOverlord:

Enhanced Foreign Advisor
Enhanced Military Advisor

12Monkeys:

Modified Domestic Advisor
Intercept Reinitialization
Plotlist Enhancement

Zuul:

New Promotions
Random unit upgrade chance (Exceptional units)
Inspiration for workshop and watermill improvement

Kael:

Slavery feature and inspiration for some of the civic changes
Informant skin and slave button and model

talchas: Promotions Pedia Info
MasterLexx: New resources
Ploepe: Fantasy buttons
The_Lopez: Specialist Stacker
seZereth: Great Doctor skin
Aussie_Lurker: Free specialist for creative trait inspiration and code
MerakSpeilman: Commerce Icon Change
Anhu: 5-Formations (modified)
Snaitf: Show Attitude Mod
snv: for help with testing

Also thanks goes out to those who have answered numerous question of mine related to python editing:
Sevo, The Great Apple, The Lopez, Bhruic, Kael, talchas, Locutus and 12monkeys.

Some of the python code I borrowed already had additional merging of mods within it so I'm not sure if I got everyone here on the credits section. If I appear to be missing someone and it's bothering you let me know and I'll add them.

Drakonik · Mar 5, 2006

Seems very promising. I'll be sure to test this mod the next time I have a bit of free-time. Maybe this weekend.

JohnSearle · Mar 5, 2006

As Drakonik said: Looks very promising! I'll test it as well on my next MP session.

-- John

Aeon221 · Mar 5, 2006

Not bad at all. Only thing I see is that you are mostly picking ideas you like and justifying them

Lets see some counter arguments!

Mostly I agree, these changes aren't too major and seem fairly handy. I would like to see more promotion types available though.

Have you thought about adding a base +5 exp to all units built in order to have some instant early decisions to make with them? I've always thought that unit specialization should come a little bit sooner than after the first four or five battles, since that is a new feature that really adds a lot to the series.

... but that was a little off topic.

In general, V. good stuff, but not really what I was expecting from the title.

naf4ever · Mar 5, 2006

Aeon221 said:
Not bad at all. Only thing I see is that you are mostly picking ideas you like and justifying them Lets see some counter arguments!

Thats because Ive had little public feedback until now. This is exactly what Im looking for though

. By releasing it here I hope other people will provide these counter arguments to help me flush out certain aspects and balance out things that I may have missed or unbalanced.

Mostly I agree, these changes aren't too major and seem fairly handy. I would like to see more promotion types available though.

I havent done this because im not 100% convinced yet on the AI's ability to really utilize additional promotions properly. Multiplayer considerations are first but I dont want to introduce something that weakens the AI in single player. Furthermore getting too specialized such as Shock or Cover promotions levels 2 or 3 can make certain units a little too dominant in an era where most people have only one type of unit as their main defense. You bring up a good point though,, I also want to see new promotions but I'd like to see something totally new, not just higher levels of existing ones. I have all of Zuul's additional promotions in this mod, but commented out. I will probably re-examine a few over time and add them in.

Have you thought about adding a base +5 exp to all units built in order to have some instant early decisions to make with them? I've always thought that unit specialization should come a little bit sooner than after the first four or five battles, since that is a new feature that really adds a lot to the series.

... but that was a little off topic.

This is a good idea and some mods are going that route. I dont think it would be in theme with what i have planned though and would also make the aggressive trait pointless.

In general, V. good stuff, but not really what I was expecting from the title.

Patience my friend. This was just released today and the mod is still very young....

OblivionOdyssey · Mar 6, 2006

Fantastic to hear that a mod is being designed with the sole purpose of increasing and changing the strategical elements of the game. Keep up the good work, I can see this being a very promising mod!

dh_epic · Mar 6, 2006

Congratulations on taking this on. I disagree with your assessment of a lot of game balance. All in all, I think conquest is too easy and too profitable. The culture shock and the new units seem to make that easier.

But who am I to say that? The thing about balance is you play it from all angles until you really have a game where every single strategy works. Any technology at any time can possibly be a smart choice, aggression and defense are both overall successful strategies, you can make a case for any unit being the best, and so on.

Meleager · Mar 6, 2006

This looks preety good. I'll play it and try to give you some feedback as soon as possible. I especially like the thought I have seen put into this.

naf4ever · Mar 6, 2006

dh_epic said:
Congratulations on taking this on. I disagree with your assessment of a lot of game balance. All in all, I think conquest is too easy and too profitable. The culture shock and the new units seem to make that easier.

But who am I to say that? The thing about balance is you play it from all angles until you really have a game where every single strategy works. Any technology at any time can possibly be a smart choice, aggression and defense are both overall successful strategies, you can make a case for any unit being the best, and so on.

When you have time please reply back on some specific areas you feel need rexamining. This is what i want. If conquest starts to become too profitable with this mod I can alter or tweak things like the techconquest addition. Also i guess i should point it out but techconquest doesnt grant a whole tech when capturing a city, just a percentage of the research points of a tech. The culture decay i think makes culture even that more important now and more useful during endgame. I've been looking at the formula for it though and can tweak it some if needed.

I know what you mean about conquest being too easy sometimes though, especially against a player who's behind. Thats why I did things like add the castles earlier, the informant and the bazooka. Each of these help resource poor empires mount a much better defense against would be aggressors. In addition the only units I added that can actually help capture cities are the cataphract which still gets owned by spearmen (and is actually worse against archers than horse archers) and the howitzer which isnt much more powerful than an artillery. Furthermore I think that right now conquest is very easy against the AI but thats not necessarily the case vs a human. A skilled player is very hard to take down. As for the former, I dont know what can be done about the AI except gearing new changes toward helping it but thats not what I'm aiming for. At some point I will probably just accept that the changes Im making will add to the game in multiplayer but maybe take a bit away from the single player experience.

I will add techconquest to the alteration analysis though to be looked at more thoroughly on the impact its having.

kevjm · Mar 6, 2006

Why not give all units a base 2 or 3 experience? That'll open the shock promotion and others I can't recall at this time to aggressive civs instantly but will also weaken the aggressive trait in the way you stated above.
Not sure how it will affect the barracks and other experience giving buildings though.

Zuul · Mar 6, 2006

Or include my mod that has some small chance of giving promotions to new units.

Simmelan · Mar 6, 2006

Sorry, not sure of the etique....

So let me know where am I to ask...

I am trying out the mod but I keep getting an error when loading the mod "Failed to load python module CvEventInterface".

OKAY!

Fix the problem... apparently I thought the mod is suppose to go into my documents\...\... as this is where I placed all the customised map scripts...
Once i place it into the <installaion>\mod... Viola the problem goes away!

dh_epic · Mar 6, 2006

naf4ever said:
I know what you mean about conquest being too easy sometimes though, especially against a player who's behind. Thats why I did things like add the castles earlier, the informant and the bazooka.

The current game balance makes it so you can't possibly wage a successful war AND build the wonders you want unless you're already miles ahead, usually on a low difficulty level. Sometimes building that wonder should be huge, and sometimes ignoring the wonder and starting a war right then and there should be huge. You should seldom be able to pull of both successfully.

The key is this: you can't always put the killer units on the military branches. If chasing the peaceful techs means that you're a sitting duck, it's too weak. If chasing the peaceful branches mean you get killer units AND wonders, it's too strong.

Finding that sweet spot is hard, but if you're flexible enough to do whatever it takes, and you're patient enough, you can do it.

naf4ever · Mar 6, 2006

kevjm said:
Why not give all units a base 2 or 3 experience? That'll open the shock promotion and others I can't recall at this time to aggressive civs instantly but will also weaken the aggressive trait in the way you stated above.
Not sure how it will affect the barracks and other experience giving buildings though.

Well you can just build a barracks then aggressive civs can get that level 3 promotion right off the bat. I purposely didnt include anything that gave more xps in this mod this way there remains a distinct difference between playing an aggressive and non-aggressive civ.

Zuul said:
Or include my mod that has some small chance of giving promotions to new units.

Ya i saw that in a mod i played once, i forget which one though. It was kind of cool I thought and it added some chance without screwing anything else up. I will need to look at the python code again because im concerned about how it generates the chance. Ive played many multiplayer games and have noticed certain implementations of a random chance generator will cause out of sync errors more. In addition mods like the Random Events one causes problems sometimes with the ntdll.dll file in windows preventing you from even starting a multiplayer game.

I'm going to add it to my list though since i liked how it worked in the other mods and try to implement it here.

dh_epic said:
The key is this: you can't always put the killer units on the military branches. If chasing the peaceful techs means that you're a sitting duck, it's too weak. If chasing the peaceful branches mean you get killer units AND wonders, it's too strong.

Ya thats the hard part. This is something that takes lots of time and testing to really iron out. I will watch how people respond to how it is now and monitor what they are saying. In addition Im going to update my alteration analysis sometime this week on why i added the techconquest and culturedecay mod in the first place.

Phoenix · Mar 6, 2006

This looks like a very good mod (based on the spoilers) and its definetly a good idea to consider balance in the game like you have. Good job.

Nightravn · Mar 6, 2006

naf- in your notes it said you we rethinking the industrious trait. How bout making the change like it is in the SevoMOD were it adds one to production like the finical trait does for commerce? I think that is a much more balanced trait then the 50% wonders as it helps with all production instead of just wonders.

naf4ever · Mar 6, 2006

Nightravn said:
naf- in your notes it said you we rethinking the industrious trait. How bout making the change like it is in the SevoMOD were it adds one to production like the finical trait does for commerce? I think that is a much more balanced trait then the 50% wonders as it helps with all production instead of just wonders.

Ya i was thinking about that, i like how its done in his mod. I'd like to try something different though. I notice its limited what you can customize with the civ traits, but there seems to be more flexibility in what im able to change for the leaders. I can do things like give industrial leaders unique buildings or even free buildings at the start i think. I can also make a hidden tech just for the purposes of customizing certain leaders and have them start with that tech for free, then I have all the flexibility of tech options to customize an industrial leader with. Im going to look at this more. Im also still pondering over creative.

In the meantime though I probably will change it so its like financial, but for production.

Bringa · Mar 7, 2006

This is an epic undertaking, but I'm sure you understand that

I wish you lots of endurance.

A couple of things you mention in your document I've been thinking about as well; tech trading especially, and the forests. I'd like to add that I think lumber mills ought to become more efficient with some techs. Iirc right now there's at least two techs that give water/windmills additional usefulness; but nothing really improves lumber mills, does it? If there was a tech at some point down the line that further improved lumber mills, I think that would be additional incentive to keep those forests around for a bit. On the other hand, (and I'm aware of the awkward balance between authenticity and game-balance one must aim to reach in modding) from an authenticity point of view the current state of affairs *is* realistic. It's simply a fact that at some point in human history we started chopping down forests aggressively; also, forests can be replanted (especially for things like paper production). We should look into what reasons there are today in real life for replanting forests and then translate that into a set of advantages/disadvantages that work for the game.

SDI I very much agree with as well; right now it practically makes nukes useless. There were games where I fired ten nukes on one city just to see them all shot down. I think next to making it more expensive, one should make it a little less effective (and maybe boost the efficiency of nukes as well, because as they are right now, they're just a little annoying (and even less so once you got scrubbing abilities); they ought to be game deciding, I think) (both in their destructive potential and in the disadvantages there are to using them) (now that I'm on a parenthetical rant, let me look at the possible disadvantages. Global warming due to nuking is a little lame and not very authentic at all--nuclear winter, maybe, but nuclear summer doesn't seem likely at all. Clearly the problem inherent in nukes is different: MAD, for once, and general global isolation. If Iran was to use nukes on, say, Israel, and if Israel really doesn't have nukes to answer with (that's the official version, remember! ;p), then Iran would still go down some way for sure: Russia, Europe, and the US at the very least would gang up on Iran. We need to reproduce this disadvantage to nukes. While it might be feasible to just make AIs attack a certain player, we're clearly looking at MP here. So how about this: using nukes creates unhappiness: not only in the people living in the state that used nukes, but also in the people living in states allied with the bad guys. For instance, it might create unhappiness in your cities if you kept trading with bad states; technology/resource trading. Also it might come to the point where your people would be mad at you if you DON'T go to war with one of those bad states (especially if they attacked one of your close allies). I don't know if this isn't too extreme a modification though)

naf4ever · Mar 7, 2006

Bringa said:
This is an epic undertaking, but I'm sure you understand that I wish you lots of endurance.

A couple of things you mention in your document I've been thinking about as well; tech trading especially, and the forests. I'd like to add that I think lumber mills ought to become more efficient with some techs. Iirc right now there's at least two techs that give water/windmills additional usefulness; but nothing really improves lumber mills, does it? If there was a tech at some point down the line that further improved lumber mills, I think that would be additional incentive to keep those forests around for a bit. On the other hand, (and I'm aware of the awkward balance between authenticity and game-balance one must aim to reach in modding) from an authenticity point of view the current state of affairs *is* realistic. It's simply a fact that at some point in human history we started chopping down forests aggressively; also, forests can be replanted (especially for things like paper production). We should look into what reasons there are today in real life for replanting forests and then translate that into a set of advantages/disadvantages that work for the game.

I probably wont increase mill production because at the moment they are the best production tiles in the game. A plains/hill produces 4 production with a mine, or 5 with the bonus from railroad. The same tile forested with a lumbermill also produces 4, or again 5 with the rail bonus. But on top of that its netting you the .5 health bonus per square. In addition I dont want to render useless workshops. They aren't used much currently but do fill a specialty role for someone whose chopped down all thier forests in a town with no hills that needs production tiles. This was also one of my reaons for not putting forest replanting in. I might as well remove the workshop improvement if i do because who would use them over mills? What I could do which came to mine once was allow forest replanting,, but make the new forest inferior somehow. Also i think the idea of good forest management through replanting is already modeled in the game. This is what working a forest tile is i think. While chopping it is like clear cutting.

SDI I very much agree with as well; right now it practically makes nukes useless. There were games where I fired ten nukes on one city just to see them all shot down. I think next to making it more expensive, one should make it a little less effective (and maybe boost the efficiency of nukes as well, because as they are right now, they're just a little annoying (and even less so once you got scrubbing abilities); they ought to be game deciding, I think) (both in their destructive potential and in the disadvantages there are to using them) (now that I'm on a parenthetical rant, let me look at the possible disadvantages. Global warming due to nuking is a little lame and not very authentic at all--nuclear winter, maybe, but nuclear summer doesn't seem likely at all. Clearly the problem inherent in nukes is different: MAD, for once, and general global isolation. If Iran was to use nukes on, say, Israel, and if Israel really doesn't have nukes to answer with (that's the official version, remember! ;p), then Iran would still go down some way for sure: Russia, Europe, and the US at the very least would gang up on Iran. We need to reproduce this disadvantage to nukes. While it might be feasible to just make AIs attack a certain player, we're clearly looking at MP here. So how about this: using nukes creates unhappiness: not only in the people living in the state that used nukes, but also in the people living in states allied with the bad guys. For instance, it might create unhappiness in your cities if you kept trading with bad states; technology/resource trading. Also it might come to the point where your people would be mad at you if you DON'T go to war with one of those bad states (especially if they attacked one of your close allies). I don't know if this isn't too extreme a modification though)

You got a point there. The AI responds badly to people using nukes but again this isnt a concern at all in multiplayer. I think you could model this into a multiplayer game somehow by having your empire suffer some unhappiness like you said if you are currently allied with someone who's going nuke crazy. I will definitely add this to my analysis. Im a bit behind my estimated date though for my tech trading model so I wont be able to really try to figure how to code it until after thats done first. As for the mechanics of how nukes work this will be in something to look into in the long run simply because the technical aspects of modding it right now are kind of difficult.

Good ideas though, keep em coming.

[MOD] Ultimate Strategy

Dread Lord

Dread Lord

Crazier than thou

Chieftain

Lord of the Cheese Helmet

Dread Lord

Master

Cold War Veteran

Stoned as a Statue

Dread Lord

Warlord

Mod lister!

Chieftain

Cold War Veteran

Dread Lord

Creating Scenarios

Warlord

Dread Lord

King

Dread Lord

Similar threads