| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Do You Think Was Better? | |||
| Civ III |
|
38 | 15.90% |
| Civ IV |
|
201 | 84.10% |
| Voters: 239. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,320
|
Which Civ game was better, Civ IV or Civ III?
In your opinion, which Civ game was better, Civ IV or Civ III? Personally, I like Civ III because the adivsors actually have faces, but I also like Civ IV for everything else, any thoughts? I'm going to add a poll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29
|
I prefer Civ IV because they eliminated most of the tedious micromanagement from it, and the combat system is much much more exciting (with promotions, units specialized against other types of units, etc.)... I think Civ IV is the best of all Civ games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US of A
Posts: 32
|
Well i like civ 3 game play better because of the micro management. Makes the game more realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,320
|
^That's true, It would be awesome if they made some Leaderheads of Advisors! Ahhh! That would be the best!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Capitalist Missionary
|
Civ IV is the best computer game ever, but I really don't play many computer games. But I have played both, and Civ IV beats Civ III on every level imaginable (except Civ III had guerillas; but they were too weak).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 2,534
|
The corruption in Civ3 ruined it for me. Once beyond a ridiculously small distance from your palaces, cities only produced one unit of production or cash, so you had to feed them with units from your core cities in order to build anything,
So I find Civ4 far, far better, But it would have been nice to be able to feed new cities with extra production, sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Chock full of V goodness
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
__________________
Military Police; 1 Turn of Anarchy can save you 15% or more on your war weariness. Never give up! Never stop believing in what you believe in! Never say never, NEVER! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 16
|
Civ 4: less mirco-managing=more fun playing...
The graphics are cool too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 24
|
I consider CIV III the 'classical' Civ. Civ IV has a lot of changes and thus is the 'new' civ. I like new more, though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: City of one angel
Posts: 10,517
|
Quote:
not another of those threads please. In this forum, almost everyone will praise CIV, go to the Civ3 forum and it would be the other way round. Be happy with whatever version you like and enjoy the game. Both have the pros and cons
__________________
Civ 3: SG wins : among others SID, DG OCC, AWS small, 3 AWD (standard map), AWE/20k, 5CC AWE, RaR: SID Civ4 SG highlights: 4 immortal wins (UN/3 dom), AWE Rome, AWP hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 399
|
I never played civ III, but I find civ IV interesting but ultimately a bit boring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Wolfie
|
Quote:
__________________
My AARs, mostly of Civ4 RFC and FFH reports: Byzantium, Turkey, France, Mughals, Calabim, Doviello, Ljosalfar, Kuriorates, Svartalfar, Eu3 Marathas, Civ3 WH Indics. My FFH modmod Last edited by Lone Wolf; Jul 05, 2007 at 12:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Worker
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 2,762
|
I played Civ II and Civ IV, but never played Civ III... But I don't see how it could be any better than Civ IV
__________________
The only constant is change. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 526
|
i more like Civ4, though Civ3 is pretty good
__________________
Ÿ¦Ÿ¦°×Íà –|×ßÎ÷î™ Ò²»ÈçРÈ˲»Èç¹Ê A lonely white rabbit on the way Looking back the road from where he came New clothes get dressed everyday But formers no more stay |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Caffeinated Khagan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moved back into the kimchi jar
Posts: 3,164
|
Not *another* one of these threads. Hasn't the dead horse been beat up enough?
I play Civ4, but I much prefer Civ3 simply for the reason that it has a much more epic feel and because I don't need programming know-how or 3d Studio Max to mod it. I actually find Civ4 graphics absolutely horrible, but gameplay comes first and Civ4 gameplay is quite good. Civ3 gameplay, however, is more to my liking. It's just a matter of taste, not a matter of which is "better" than the other.
__________________
"You can't discuss the ocean with a well frog. You can't discuss ice with a summer insect. You can't discuss the Way with a cramped scholar." -Zhuangzi "And what do we got on this thing? A Cuisinart?!? - Dark Helmet |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
^^ bad diplomat ^^
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The end of the world. NC, USA :)
Posts: 300
|
Civ IV ftw!!
Love this game. Graphics, gameplay, and all that. It has improved much from Civ III, imho. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Where we live today, sports.
Posts: 1,282
|
Why leave out Civ II?
II for what it's worth was the most groundbreaking of all of them.
I proved the concept and showed some promise, but II was truly groundbreaking and showed what could happen with TBS. III was ill concieved from the start in many ways. IV took the bad aspects of III out and paired it with good graphics. If I had to rank them. II IV III I |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,320
|
^I left out II and I because most people haven't played them...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Just converted to Civ IV from Civ III, Big difference! | battlepancho | Civ4 - General Discussions | 16 | Mar 05, 2009 07:59 AM |
| Thinking of playing CIV III due to slowness of CIV IV... | handydandy | Civ4 - General Discussions | 13 | Dec 16, 2008 11:41 PM |
| Use your tv as a monitor to play Civ III & Civ IV...? | Sharon | Civ3 - Creation & Customization | 2 | Mar 14, 2006 11:24 AM |
| Played Civ III a lot - confused trading resources in Civ IV... help | joethreeblah | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 2 | Oct 31, 2005 08:07 PM |
| Poll: Which version of Civ do you like the most? CIV I, II, III or IV | jayband | Civ4 - General Discussions | 15 | Oct 29, 2005 10:12 AM |