Man versus Wild--The guy eats 6 foot long tarantula

Whomp

Keep Calm and Carry On
Retired Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
18,200
Location
Chicago
It's all a fraud! :( The dude gets blueberry pancakes in plush hotels. Is it time for a Navy Seal to do the job instead of a SAS guy?

To viewers of his TV series, Bear Grylls is the daredevil adventurer who catapults himself into world's worst 'hellholes' and then survives on his wits alone.

But it has emerged that far from roughing it in brutal environments, the former SAS man actually spent nights in hotels during filming of his Channel 4 show.

The Eton- educated 33-year- old is also alleged to have choreographed parts of Born Survivor, with many of his spectacular stunts carefully set up by the production crew.

Channel 4 last night began an investigation into the claims, which follow a number of embarrassing incidents in which programmes screened by the station were found to have misled the public.

Grylls's show attracted 1.4million viewers when it was shown in March and April, with audiences enthralled as he demonstrated gruesome survival tips that included sucking the fluid from fish eyeballs and squeezing water from animal dung.

But an adviser to Born Survivor yesterday claimed that many of his other escapades were not exactly as they seemed on TV.

In one episode filmed in California's Sierra Nevada mountains he was shown biting off the head of a snake for breakfast and boasting that he was living on 'just a water bottle, a cup and a flint for making fire'.

Viewers were not told that he was actually spending some nights in the Pines Resort hotel at Bass Lake, where the rooms have Internet access and is advertised as 'a cosy getaway for families' complete with blueberry pancakes for breakfast.

In another episode when Grylls declared he was a 'real life Robinson Crusoe' stuck on a desert island, he was actually on an outlying part of the Hawaiian archipelago and retired to a motel at nightfall.

Mark Weinert, a survival consultant brought in for the programme, said one show also wrongly gave the impression that the adventurer built a Polynesian- style raft using only materials around him, including bamboo and palm leaves for a sail.

Mr Weinert had in fact led a team that built the raft, which was then dismantled so that Grylls could be shown constructing it on camera.

In another episode, Grylls was filmed attempting to lasso 'wild' mustang in the Sierra Nevada, when the horses were actually tame and had been brought in by trailer from a nearby trekking station.

'If you really believe everything happens the way it is shown on TV, you are being a little bit naive,' Mr Weinert told the Sunday Times.

Channel 4 confirmed that Grylls had used hotels during expeditions and ordered the production company that made the programme to investigate the other claims.

A spokesman said: 'We take any allegations of misleading our audiences seriously.

'Bear does do all his own stunts and does put himself in perilous situations.

'But Born Survivor is not an observational documentary series but a "how to" guide to basic survival techniques in extreme environments. The programme explicitly does not claim that presenter Bear Grylls's experience is one of unaided solo survival.'

Grylls had earlier told how Channel 4 bosses had pitched the series to him, saying: 'We just drop you into a lot of different hellholes equipped with nothing, and you do what you have to do to survive.'

Last week Channel 4 had to apologise after it emerged that when Gordon Ramsay was shown appearing to spear a sea bass off the English coast for an episode of The F Word, the scene had been faked.

This month, the operators of the Richard & Judy premium rate TV quiz were hit with a record fine of £150,000 for a phone-in scandal.

Viewers had been urged to call in to the competition even though the shortlist of winners was closed.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=470155&in_page_id=1770
 
Firstly, the SAS are better than the Navy Seals, even the TA (reserve) SAS, which is what Grylls was part of (;)lol, just to stomp on any American egoes), and secondly, that is the nature of television. Anyone who for one minute believed it was all authentic is clearly of low intellect. Ever thought of the camera crew? Do you think they would try and live in those conditions while maintaining such equipment as well? I knew from the start a lot of Bear Grylls is faked for viewing purposes.
 
It's all a fraud! :( The dude gets blueberry pancakes in plush hotels. Is it time for a Navy Seal to do the job instead of a SAS guy?
Navy Seals cannot handle hotel made blueberry pancakes, they only can digest homebaked applepie.

But WTF?
I saw short moment of interview with Conan with this guy and I thought I would like to check out that show.

Too bad if it's a fraud. What's next? Myth of Mythbusters busted?
 
Actually, it's probably comparing apple pies to blueberry pancakes with SAS and Navy Seals.

Delta Force and SAS would be the better comparison.
 
ooh great now this thread turns into a big ol' who's weewee is bigger contest about special forces.
 
I don't get the title of the thread.

shouldn't be 6 feet tarantula?

or 6 tarantulas, one foot each?

or is there a species of tarantulas called foot tarantula?

Anyway. Anybody besides me thinks that television has changed a lot in the last 20 years and that there are too many channels and too few ideas? So the producers have to cheat to attract audience.

Does anybody watch movies on TV any more? Seems to me that it is not profitable to broadcast movies on TV as it was say 20 years ago. People have already saw them or if they want to watch a movie, they just rent/buy it. So TV has to find other type of programs to air.
 
survivor man was always cooler anyways. he didn't even use a camera crew!

canadian outdoorsy dude > special forces pancake eatin' pansy
 
ooh great now this thread turns into a big ol' who's weewee is bigger contest about special forces.
That was not the intent and I realize that it's all about teamwork amongst all the special forces. The SAS developed the standard that guides them.
I don't get the title of the thread.

shouldn't be 6 feet tarantula?

or 6 tarantulas, one foot each?

or is there a species of tarantulas called foot tarantula?
Edited to correct standards.
If this is the show that I'm thinking, I'm very sad.
But it would be nice if someone could actually make a show like this...seeing him squeeze elephant dung for water was pretty cool. Now I'm not sure it was real...:(
 
Yeah, what Fifty said. I knew the first time I watched this show that it was fake, just because he had a freaking camera crew along with him. I mean, I'm not saying that Survivor Man is necessarily 100% authentic, but at least he doesn't have a camera crew... :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, I figured it was fake. The only episode I saw was the jungle one. I immediately figured that he had a camera crew, and I didn't think they would be roughing it.
 
Of course you are supposed to know he has a camera crew. It says so in the credits and he has, on occasion, said that he is out there with just 2 camera men. Of course in the credits they also list a "survival expert" so I've always figured one of the camera men was that expert (or he had an expert with him). In short, I thought it was somewhat fake but not as fake as the report is making it out to be. I thought he really did spend the nights outside, but I also thought that he had someone giving him advice on what to do to overcome certain obstacles.

I also thought that certain things, such as the horses in that one episode, were planted. Can you imagine how many takes it would have taken to get him hitting that rabbit with the throwing stick too? If he missed he would have to find a whole new rabbit. I think he just aimed a stick at it, missed barely, had them cut the shot at the last second and then showed him later eating a roasted rabbit that they had shot somewhere. I dunno, sometimes you fake it a bit for television. The island rescue thing was kind of hokey too. Still, I never imagined he'd actually be staying in motels.
 
Well it is still an entertaining show. But I'd rather watch Ray Mears
 
Never watching that show again. I only saw it once though. :)
 
I knew it was faked from the very beginning. How can a show seriously put its host in serious physical danger while having a camera crew watching innocently from the sidelines? Talk about liability.

Honestly, I never watched the show because I had the nagging suspicious it was all a sham. I guess I've been proven right.
 
To me the show seemed like a really low budget British version of MacGyver without a plot.
 
'If you really believe everything happens the way it is shown on TV, you are being a little bit naive,' Mr Weinert told the Sunday Times.

That quote sums it up the best. It was disappointing to read this thread, since I watch Man vs. Wild nearly every Friday and have seen all the episodes. A lot of the criticism I've read is that he does stuff that is too "dramatized", "risky", or just plain "stupid". Sure, I'll give you that - after all, it's television, you want viewers to be entertained. I watch his show for entertainment and information about a subject I don't really know. If I was in a similar situation, would I do the stuff he does? Probably not. I think the show is more or less about how he would survive, not any normal person.

Of course, this all goes out the window with reading this article. I've seen other reports about how the show isn't as tough as it seems, but nothing in depth like this. It's hard to imagine a guy would intentionally want to mislead people about the very core of the show. I have seen the ads on the Discovery Channel for Survivorman with Les Stroud, and while I may keep watching Man vs. Wild just for fun, I'll also give that show a try. Man vs. Wild - pure survival? I doubt it; it's hard to imagine all this stuff (staying at motels/hotels, "planting" of things, etc.) though...
 
Top Bottom