Can anyone actually present evidence for creationism in this thread? ATPG and I will happily remain silent for 24 hours to see if anyone actually produces any.
Question to Evolutionists: How does evolution work when compared with the Second Law of Thermodynamics? If it does not apply, why not? That seems to me to be proof of Creationism in some form.
Oh, come on, this old canard has been refuted many times:
The second law says that temperature, pressure, and chemical potential proceed toward greater entropy in a closed system. The Earth is hardly a closed system, receiving much energy in the form of sunlight all the time.
The second law only says that the overall system proceeds toward greater entropy; there can be pockets of greater potential (lesser entropy). If we couldn't have pockets of greater potential, then growth would impossible, much less evolution.
The second law suggests that the entire solar system, being relatively closed, will fizzle out in a couple of billion years, but it doesn't imply that we cannot create smaller pieces of order and potential in the mean time.
Again, please stop trying to disprove evolution, and concentrate on EVIDENCE FOR CREATIONISM.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
