Just to clarify, Scotland is still part of the United Kingdom. They haven't departed. Furthermore, the Act of Union of 1707 was a parliamentary act, passed democratically, creating the UK without war or violence.[...] English was the dominant nation of British Empire. Then scots and Eire departed.
This is just like Turks and Ottoman Empire case. Ottoman Empire was dominantly Turkish though it had many minorities.
Just to clarify, Scotland is still part of the United Kingdom. They haven't departed. Furthermore, the Act of Union of 1707 was a parliamentary act, passed democratically, creating the UK without war or violence.
this is a form.Just to clarify, Scotland is still part of the United Kingdom. They haven't departed. Furthermore, the Act of Union of 1707 was a parliamentary act, passed democratically, creating the UK without war or violence.
Yes, but during most international meeting Scotland is represented as part of the UK. Just like on maps and so on. All German Federal States have an own Parliament and President but they are still part of the Federal Republic of Germany, just like Scotland is part of the UK.
if u lived outside USA, you would see that nobody praises him.
Actually, he's increasingly regarded with fear and/or derision in America as well.
But never mind that; I want to ask what the article has to say about other matters besides leaders and war. What about city management? For example, will we be able to ship food?
I think Scotland would be fine if city-states are small civs, rather than just cities. Most of the audience don't perceive Scotland as part of England (or even the UK). Most Americans are surprised to hear Scotland is not independent.
Quit being narrow minded, crying wolf about the sky is falling chicken little. Wait till you get your hands on the game. You are welcome to have an opinion, but you are doing the exact same kneejerk reaction that happened when Civ IV was in production. The Civ 3 fans did the exact same thing you are now pretty much. Yet Civ IV was and is a great game. So instead of being pessimistic about it, why not have a bit of faith in them? They have proved 4 times so far that they know what they are doing. Thats a pretty good track record so far. Infallible? Not at all. Skilled, intelligent, and trying to evolve the Civilization series? Yes.It didn't say anything about that! The way they are going, I am beginning to not have any hopes for much. Apparently, they aren't making a sequel to Civ... they are making one for Panzer General!
Quit being narrow minded, crying wolf about the sky is falling chicken little. Wait till you get your hands on the game. You are welcome to have an opinion, but you are doing the exact same kneejerk reaction that happened when Civ IV was in production. The Civ 3 fans did the exact same thing you are now pretty much. Yet Civ IV was and is a great game. So instead of being pessimistic about it, why not have a bit of faith in them? They have proved 4 times so far that they know what they are doing. Thats a pretty good track record so far. Infallible? Not at all. Skilled, intelligent, and trying to evolve the Civilization series? Yes.
I wouldn't assume that. You might be surprised to hear that people all over the globe flock to American universities because they are among the best and most financially available in the world. You'd be more likely to find Americans that don't even know what Scotland is, as opposed to ones thinking that it is independent.