TheMarshmallowBear
Benelovent Chieftain of the Ursu Kingdom
Aren't both Isabella of Castille and the different Montezumas pretty much always confused with one another in Civ games?
Maybe Monte II. is part of vanilla, and Monte I is pre-order.
They might make two leaders for the Aztecs.
So the leader of the Aztecs is revealed to be Montezuma I, not the pictured Montezuma II...
I swear if this was all a ruse and we've spent 100 pages on this I will cry eagle tears.
Tiritades III was decent king, allying with Rome in Roman-Persian wars and protecting Armenian kingdom, but the reason he is known is definitely the adoption of Christianity.
Not to confuse him with Tiritades the Great which founded brief Armenian Empire three centuries earlier, the highest extent of Armenia ever. Those two would be main candidates for Armenian civ.
We already got Barbarossa right, so it can't be that bad.
so.. do you think they will model Isabella of Castille's appearance based on Isabella of Portugal?
so.. do you think they will model Isabella of Castille's appearance based on Isabella of Portugal? Unlike Monty I or II, there's enough European art / painting that illustrate them.. I think.
I believe the Gustavus in BNW was modeled after a different Swedish king named Gustavus
I think it was Eric XIV he was based off of, but you're definitely right that they used a different leader as inspiration for his design. I'm certain Montezuma I is just based of the painting of Montezuma II because they liked how he looked in that painting. Or they just google searched 'Montezuma' and that's the image they got.
The board is not a design reference. If it's not a tease for us (which is possible), it's some kind of info stand to discuss leaders and show their implementation state (as there are in-game and concept art pieces). Such board don't need accurate pics.
Just curious: why do you keep saying the Isabella on the board is "the wrong Isabella"? What's wrong with her?