Byzantine Bomb
Warlord
Does anyone else, at times, forgo the most lucrative trade routes in favor of others?
I refer to choosing to trade with a city that increase religious pressure while not generating as much money as some other routes might. Conversely, do some choose to shy away from potential routes that could increase a foreign religion's pressure? Lastly, do some choose to send trade routes to weaker civs in favor of stronger civs, despite the lower revenue generated, thus helping strengthen the weak to balance the strong?
I myself almost always refuse to trade with my rival power and/or the next strongest religious player. My nation is quite the theocracy generally.
Usually, my early trade routes are sent to city states to increase religious pressure there, in favor of nearby civs seeking to spread their faith. Looking at you, Maya and India.
I refer to choosing to trade with a city that increase religious pressure while not generating as much money as some other routes might. Conversely, do some choose to shy away from potential routes that could increase a foreign religion's pressure? Lastly, do some choose to send trade routes to weaker civs in favor of stronger civs, despite the lower revenue generated, thus helping strengthen the weak to balance the strong?
I myself almost always refuse to trade with my rival power and/or the next strongest religious player. My nation is quite the theocracy generally.
Usually, my early trade routes are sent to city states to increase religious pressure there, in favor of nearby civs seeking to spread their faith. Looking at you, Maya and India.