am i the only one who hates ron?!

historical???? it has a paper, rock blah blah system.. it sucks...

a singel calvery unit kills my mg, a guy with a musket destroys my tank, a damn AROW SHOTS DOWN MYA BOMBER!! AN AROW A FREAKING AAAAARRRROOOOOOOOOWWW
 
Vietcong said:
historical???? it has a paper, rock blah blah system.. it sucks...

a singel calvery unit kills my mg, a guy with a musket destroys my tank, a damn AROW SHOTS DOWN MYA BOMER!! AN AROW A FREAKING AAAAARRRROOOOOOOOOWWW

BY DA FREAKING TP EXPENTON PAK, TEN NO MOR CALVERY KILL MGZ, AND THEN NO MORE ANTIARCRAF AAAAAAAAARRRROOOOOOWWWW 4 U!!!!!!11111 :rolleyes: :shakehead :p
 
Fox Mccloud said:
BY DA FREAKING TP EXPENTON PAK, TEN NO MOR CALVERY KILL MGZ, AND THEN NO MORE ANTIARCRAF AAAAAAAAARRRROOOOOOWWWW 4 U!!!!!!11111 :rolleyes: :shakehead :p
HA HA!

:D

But yeah, shut up if you don't like the game, Vietcong.
 
I think there are a few more nations that should be added : like u need something in Australia

Also NOTHING EVER MISSES which is a bit disturbing ... it kinda takes away the point of having those ranged cav fire on the move!
 
I dont hate the game, but I dont love it. A great game when you feel like killing something.
 
I don't play this game. But if your gonna be a critic. Be a constructive critic...
:p
 
Ive seen stuff miss in RoN, its just not ranged cavalry- try Archers or Fire Lances.

BTW, I think that RoN is probably one of the best RTSs ever made, though the Expansion does add a lot more intricacies to it, and therefore makes it a far more interesting game.
 
ok, about your "arrow" incident.

1. Your bomber had low hp
2. if it was a lookout, lookouts are close to SAM installations, therefore it kills the bomber
3. yer ****ed up :p
 
yes vietcong you're the only hater
now go drink your napalm
 
Top Bottom