University is not a right.
I will be one of your engineers in a few years time, and I would like to see a country that admires what it has.
Wrong place, wrong time. You've got to have the sense to not show up where ruffians are going to be.Well those girls didn't pick any fights with them either.
An interesting perspective!Anyway, university is a political necessity. Which the dumb british politicians are failing to understand - it'll be their loss.
They're the modern bread and circus for a large group of people who otherwise will prove uncontrollable. Oh, I do hope that the politicians keep missing that...
Victim blaming. Classy.Wrong place, wrong time. You've got to have the sense to not show up where ruffians are going to be.
Wrong place, wrong time. You've got to have the sense to not show up where ruffians are going to be.
If there's going to be hoodlums showing up and causing problems, there's going to be collateral damage. I've attended various political events, all of them non-violent. We got our message out, respected everyone's property and safety, and nobody got hurt.Victim blaming. Classy.
It's very interesting how frequently "libertarian" types come down on the side of violent authority when it comes to street demonstrations.
A lot of student protests have been non-violent, and there's no way of telling which ones will end up that way. There was one up in Glasgow last week, and there was no violence. But, of course, they are not widely reported, creating a not-inconsiderable selection bias.If there's going to be hoodlums showing up and causing problems, there's going to be collateral damage. I've attended various political events, all of them non-violent. We got our message out, respected everyone's property and safety, and nobody got hurt.
Which also means that police violence is unusual too, right? It goes both ways on these things. As for the London police, I have no idea what they do... I know what Minneapolis cops do, I know what Japanese cops do, but not London cops.A lot of student protests have been non-violent, and there's no way of telling which ones will end up that way. There was one up in Glasgow last week, and there was no violence. But, of course, they are not widely reported, creating a not-inconsiderable selection bias.
Since it was in Glasgow, I have to ask - no violence on an absolute level, or none on a relative level?There was one up in Glasgow last week, and there was no violence.
Yep.The Met = London Metropolitan Police?
Then they do it a second time, just to make sure!They bravely drag hoodilums out of their wheelchairs in case they run people over.
True. The difference is, the police are meant to be better than the other side. As much as it seems like a double-standard, it is entirely true to say that the poor behaviour of one police officer reflects badly on the whole force in a way which is not true of a protester and the protest. The machinery of the state is simply held to a higher collective standard; that is the price of our consent to their monopoly on violence.Which also means that police violence is unusual too, right? It goes both ways on these things.
Well, what I know is that nobody actually got killed, maimed or made to eat haggis vindaloo, so perhaps the latter?Since it was in Glasgow, I have to ask - no violence on an absolute level, or none on a relative level?
Oh dear. They were really upset about the rolls royce embarassment weren't they.