Jehoshua
Catholic
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,250
I would say he is not using morality to define what is true, but rather Catholicism and its theology/philosophy/teaching, with what is morally right proceeding from that truth. Other than that, I suppose you are in a sense right when you say he rejects nihilism on sociological grounds, however that sociological rejection (its bad for people, therefore it shouldn't be followed) of course proceeds from and it contingent and secondary to a primary philosophical and theological position which is the essence of the argument, and not an argument that stands independently by itself. (which is why I said your first assertion that he is rejecting nihilism on sociological grounds, was false). Ergo a sociological problem is a manifestation of its interior error which is problematic, not the root problem itself.
Funnily enough I suppose this does enhance his argument, since the argument to its effects would resonate amongst the masses, whereas the implied philosophical and theological view would be where he engages in discourse with the various intellectuals and academics who may have adopted a nihilist view themselves.
Funnily enough I suppose this does enhance his argument, since the argument to its effects would resonate amongst the masses, whereas the implied philosophical and theological view would be where he engages in discourse with the various intellectuals and academics who may have adopted a nihilist view themselves.