That man i believe is a liar. He had personal gain. I also don't buy saddam only listened to him. I'm sure he is a rich man now.
How did he have personal gain?
That man i believe is a liar. He had personal gain. I also don't buy saddam only listened to him. I'm sure he is a rich man now.
I know almost everyone here is to FAR left, so this is kind of pointless, I guess, but do you think that the continued occupation of Iraq is justified?
I say yes. We got in there, and it is our duty to finish what we started. We should stay there and reduce the terrorist thread as much as possible. When the government WE put there is stable, we should leave.
PLEASE READ:But in the mean time, if we leave, another dictatoship will take power (openly terrorist supporting) and we will have another war that will cause the 3000 dead in Iraq to be wasted lives, and will cause another 3000 dead in the next war, not counting those dead in terrorist attacks founded by the new regime.
So what do you think on my arguments?
GRAND QUESTION!
Did Afghanistan ever attack America?
No, but Bin Laden was based there (since he was trained there by the CIA) so I think Afghanistan was justified after 9/11.
EDIT: Apparently not trained by the CIA (according to Wikipedia anyway) but funded by them.
They have to leave when the Iraq military can take 100% responsibility, doing any more or any less is immoral.
You can't just go in on bad intelligence, kill a dictator and then let the people fix them selves up out of the blue. Besides, America is doing a lot of good while in Iraq such as rebuilding and giving school supplies to children to make a better future.
GRAND QUESTION!
Did Afghanistan ever attack America?
I know almost everyone here is to FAR left, so this is kind of pointless, I guess, but do you think that the continued occupation of Iraq is justified?
I say yes. We got in there, and it is our duty to finish what we started. We should stay there and reduce the terrorist thread as much as possible. When the government WE put there is stable, we should leave.
PLEASE READ:But in the mean time, if we leave, another dictatoship will take power (openly terrorist supporting) and we will have another war that will cause the 3000 dead in Iraq to be wasted lives, and will cause another 3000 dead in the next war, not counting those dead in terrorist attacks founded by the new regime.
So what do you think on my arguments?
The problem is that if the left was intellectually honest, they would support the stabilization of Iraq. They constantly cry about how many Iraqis have died since the beginning of the war, but neglect to show any care for what will happen after we leave. I don't know how they justify that, but I would love to hear about it.
The problem is that if the left was intellectually honest, they would support the stabilization of Iraq. They constantly cry about how many Iraqis have died since the beginning of the war, but neglect to show any care for what will happen after we leave. I don't know how they justify that, but I would love to hear about it.
The reason of being against the war, and further action in the middle east because "we were lied to. We didn't find any WMD stockpiles like advertised." In my opinion, ignores all the other reasons we went and should have gone to war with Saddam, and in the end, is just completely and utterly morally bankrupt.