Jacques Lamerde
Chieftain
I love scarce resources. The early game strategy, finding locations for your 2nd, and 3rd cities, is way more of a challenge. I've never done it with raging barbarians, but that sound like a lot of fun.
I never really thought about playing with scarce resources, but this discussion has know inspired me to try. What would be a good civilization to play with in a scarce resources marathon game?
I play ONLY [scarce resources] on [marathon] on [archipelago/fractal].
Was not aware I was crazy...
Archipelago? Really?
I like to play as many gametypes, setups and speeds as possible. But even to me a archi, scarce, marathon game seems like it would be veeery slow and empty.
I never really thought about playing with scarce resources, but this discussion has know inspired me to try. What would be a good civilization to play with in a scarce resources marathon game?
My preference would be France, because the extra culture can get you a settler
quicker, which is imperative in this type of game.
Ehm... grammar nazi arrived:
Sparse: Something that is sparse is small in number or amount and spread out over an area.
Scarce: If something is scarce, there is not enough of it.
Just to annoy people...
I think setting resources to scarce halves the amount of any strategic deposits. So scarce is appropiate here. (even so, if they are sparse the scarcity will also be higher)
Scarce Resources => yes!
Why? Because the games aren't dry as described but much more strategic. Instead of having everything at hand and the same old rush for nukes instead you are forced to think and plan... feels more like a good game of chess.
I like to have scarce resources and vary the map type, this makes for a really great challenge!
I usually play with scarce resources on as I hate the late game nuke-fest.