FlorbFnarb
Warlord
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 104
Are they not able to actually found new cities and can only conquer and puppet-ize them?
Wow, that's...a really different game mechanic. Are there any other civs that have such a radically different set of mechanics? I've only played with a few of the original civs so far.
Personally I always go tradition with Venice. The free aquaducts, landed elite, and monarchy bonuses are perfect for them. Since you basically rely on your capital for everything they synergize extremely well, plus the free buildings for any cities you snag with a GMoV are pretty helpful. The wonder building bonus is also great since I find I spend most of my time building National wonders and world wonders.
The free GMoV from collective rule is nice but most of the liberty bonuses are wasted. You don't need to worry about worker speed since 2 workers will easily have every workable tile in the capital improved long before you can assign a citizen to them. Meritocracy bonus is useless since you can only make puppets, ditto for representation. The bonus to building production from republic is decent but not really enough to make liberty worthwhile.
Yes, all your expansion will be either through conquest or by puppeting city states with Merchants.
Tradition is definitely the way to go.
I've written an extensive guide for playing as Venice: http://www.megabearsfan.net/post/2014/05/15/Civ-V-Venice-strategy.aspx.
It should hopefully answer most of your questions.
Those guides are very helpful, thanks for sharing.
Well, can't exactly pass up on an opportunity for shameless self-promotion, now can I?
Make the Venetians only capable of founding coastal cities, but don't turn them into a city state.
Why? What's wrong with the way it is?
I'm not understanding the problem with Venice as it is though. Is he saying Venice is currently UP?