Ok, after spending a fair amount of time on noble and learning all the new features and concepts in civ 4, I decided to make the jump to prince, and am experiencing a lot of difficulty when it comes to warfare.
Given I almost always play the terra maps and my old civ strategies all were huge mistakes, and aweful style in civ 4, I had to re-learn essential how to play the game from the ground up in a style similar to how I would have played all the other civ games which came before. Usually I'd play the style of the wonder builder, and it took me a long time to figure out how to balance that style without getting mauled by aggressive AIs. Since then I learned to balance military and wonders on noble and have essentially dominated that difficulty level winning a large amount of games by very very wide point totals, which led me to the prince difficulty which I'm sitting at now.
I'd been reading these forums, and as a generalization from a multitude of threads I've read I gathered playing slightly more aggressively helps at higher difficulty levels due to the handicap vs tha AI with tech and such. As a result, and a couple failed attempts at prince, I'd adapted my strategy again to be more aggressive and try to make up for the handicap by essentially doubling [or more if possible] my empire size.
My initial war is almost always 100% effective. I always manage to take everything I've decided was my objective, usually sending in one full on stack with a smaller support one to handle any raiders trying to sneak behind my advance and into my territory. I try to take advantage of my unique units as much as possible, no matter what civ I'm playing with and usually rush into the age to have the first round of new units to make the war easier on my minimizing casualties [attacking at discover leading to axemen, macemen, cats, riflemen tanks, etc] saving me unnecessary unit builds come mid-age.
This is all good to do, except I'm always enountering problems as soon as I finish an expansion war. I'll manage to make peace with my victim by the time I have about 4-7 units to spare for each city along the new front and maybe one or two in all the others of my empire, and stop my advance. That's when some other empire decides to take advantage of my weakened position [or they assume it's weakened] and try to attack me. It doesn't matter who, but they lose. Then someone else attacks. And they lose, then again and again, and eventually it wear my military down to a point where I've experienced far too many wars in far too short of a time and it takes it's toll on both my tech and my economy, taking away what should have been my advantage.
another problem I'm having is with unit transporting. It seems to take forever [before railroad] to get reinforcements down to threatened cities, especially when I've got one city with the heroic epic or west point, way at the back of my territory because the front has changed so much. My best and most healthy units take forever to get into the fight!
So how am I to handle this?
Am I, not handling my diplomacy well? Or am I pushing too far forward with my fronts and over expanding? Should I be pushing forward until I reach a choke point [which isn't walways possible]. When is the ideal time to pull back and try to consolidate your gains in holding your hard earned cities? How many stacks should I have to conquer the equivalent of an entire enemy civ?
Given I almost always play the terra maps and my old civ strategies all were huge mistakes, and aweful style in civ 4, I had to re-learn essential how to play the game from the ground up in a style similar to how I would have played all the other civ games which came before. Usually I'd play the style of the wonder builder, and it took me a long time to figure out how to balance that style without getting mauled by aggressive AIs. Since then I learned to balance military and wonders on noble and have essentially dominated that difficulty level winning a large amount of games by very very wide point totals, which led me to the prince difficulty which I'm sitting at now.
I'd been reading these forums, and as a generalization from a multitude of threads I've read I gathered playing slightly more aggressively helps at higher difficulty levels due to the handicap vs tha AI with tech and such. As a result, and a couple failed attempts at prince, I'd adapted my strategy again to be more aggressive and try to make up for the handicap by essentially doubling [or more if possible] my empire size.
My initial war is almost always 100% effective. I always manage to take everything I've decided was my objective, usually sending in one full on stack with a smaller support one to handle any raiders trying to sneak behind my advance and into my territory. I try to take advantage of my unique units as much as possible, no matter what civ I'm playing with and usually rush into the age to have the first round of new units to make the war easier on my minimizing casualties [attacking at discover leading to axemen, macemen, cats, riflemen tanks, etc] saving me unnecessary unit builds come mid-age.
This is all good to do, except I'm always enountering problems as soon as I finish an expansion war. I'll manage to make peace with my victim by the time I have about 4-7 units to spare for each city along the new front and maybe one or two in all the others of my empire, and stop my advance. That's when some other empire decides to take advantage of my weakened position [or they assume it's weakened] and try to attack me. It doesn't matter who, but they lose. Then someone else attacks. And they lose, then again and again, and eventually it wear my military down to a point where I've experienced far too many wars in far too short of a time and it takes it's toll on both my tech and my economy, taking away what should have been my advantage.
another problem I'm having is with unit transporting. It seems to take forever [before railroad] to get reinforcements down to threatened cities, especially when I've got one city with the heroic epic or west point, way at the back of my territory because the front has changed so much. My best and most healthy units take forever to get into the fight!
So how am I to handle this?
Am I, not handling my diplomacy well? Or am I pushing too far forward with my fronts and over expanding? Should I be pushing forward until I reach a choke point [which isn't walways possible]. When is the ideal time to pull back and try to consolidate your gains in holding your hard earned cities? How many stacks should I have to conquer the equivalent of an entire enemy civ?