Names, Part Zero? Stepping Back

What kind of name should we use? (see post for explanations)

  • Mononym

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • Thematic

    Votes: 6 66.7%
  • Creative

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • FOSS-style

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Obscure

    Votes: 1 11.1%

  • Total voters
    9

WildWeazel

Carthago Creanda Est
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
7,378
Location
/mnt/games/Civ3/Conquests/Scenarios
Polling will continue until nomenclature improves!

Since the previous polls had so many options and were very inconclusive, I want to take a step back and ask first what kind of name we should use to see if there is a signal in the noise. Of all those mentioned, I see them falling into the 5 broad categories below. Pick your preferences, and we'll go from there.

Of course, non-binding poll as we're still under Despotism! :hammer:

Explanation of the choices:

Mononym: In the style of Civilization, a one-word title describing the concept.
Examples: Polity, Civitas, Holocene, Statecraft, Millennia, HUMANKIND

Thematic: A few words or brief phrase that evokes the historical 4X theme.
Examples: "C&C" format, Epic History, Vox Populi, Rise of Nations

Creative: A longer and/or more unique title that isn't as literal.
Examples: One Turn Deserves Another, From Stone Age to Space Age, Past is Prologue, Weight of the Crown, Call to Power

FOSS-style: Following the common pattern of open-source clones, just add a stylistic prefix/suffix.
Examples: ReCiv, OpenCiv, CiviLibre, CivPi, UnCiv

Obscure: A codename that makes no attempt to be marketable.
Examples: C7, Threepeat, Project 312
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom