NY vs Donald Trump: Hush money case

Opening statements have begun.
 
Pecker takes the stand.

Key things to know about David Pecker, ex-publisher of the National Enquirer​

From CNN's Kaanita Iyer

As the then-chairman of American Media Inc., which publishes the National Enquirer, David Pecker was involved in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes he orchestrated on behalf of Trump, and he allegedly helped broker the deal with adult film start Stormy Daniels. According to court documents, an agent for Daniels contacted AMI in October 2016 and said she was willing to go public with her allegations of an affair with Trump. Pecker then allegedly contacted Cohen, who subsequently negotiated the deal, per court filings from Cohen’s plea agreement.

In a separate incident, AMI agreed to pay model and actress Karen McDougal $150,000 months before the 2016 election for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump. While this payment is not part of the charges against the former president, prosecutors are expected to use it to establish a pattern of such payments.

Pecker has been granted immunity in exchange for his testimony and AMI signed a non-prosecution agreement with prosecutors.
 
Trump and his media enablers are all about fake news. Lying liars lying once again. And losing.

Right-Wing Network Retracts False Story About Key Witness in Trump Trial​

Michael D. Cohen’s lawyers took on OAN over the false story. The settlement came as right-wing news outlets face a barrage of defamation suits.

[IMG alt="Michael D. Cohen in a dark suit and white shirt without a tie. "]https://static01.nyt.com/images/202...pg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale[/IMG]
Michael D. Cohen has been the subject of a torrent of abuse from Donald J. Trump and his supporters. Credit...Jeenah Moon/Reuters

By Maggie Haberman and Katie Robertson
April 29, 2024, 1:10 p.m. ET

One America News, a right-wing cable news network, on Monday retracted a report claiming that Donald J. Trump’s former fixer had been the person who actually had an affair with the porn star whose claims of a sexual relationship with Mr. Trump are key to his criminal trial. The retraction came after the fixer, Michael D. Cohen, hired a leading defamation lawyer to address the false report, which was posted on the network’s website on March 27. The lawyer, Justin Nelson, had represented Dominion Voting Systems in a suit against Fox News that cost that network $787.5 million to settle. Mr. Nelson worked with Mr. Cohen’s longtime lawyer, Danya Perry, in what was a remarkably quick about-face by OAN. There are no monetary damages, but the story is being removed from the website “and all social media,” the network said in a statement on Monday.

“This retraction is part of a settlement reached with Michael Cohen,” the statement said. “OAN apologizes to Mr. Cohen for any harm the publication may have caused him.”

The Criminal Trial of Donald Trump in Manhattan​

The central charges against Mr. Trump in his Manhattan trial are that he falsified business records to a conceal hush-money payment made to Stormy Daniels, the porn star who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump in 2006. Prosecutors say the deal was meant to buy her silence during the 2016 presidential campaign. The former president faces 34 felony counts in the trial, which is scheduled to resume Tuesday. The OAN website depended on a Twitter post from a user who claimed to have been told in 2018 by Ms. Daniels’s former lawyer, Michael Avenatti, that it was actually Mr. Cohen with whom she had the affair, and that the two had a plan to “bilk” the Trump Organization out of money.

Mr. Cohen said in a statement that the story’s premise was “beyond absurd” and “just plain stupid.” He added that he and Ms. Daniels had never spoken to one another until 2021, when he interviewed her for his podcast, “Mea Culpa.”

The retraction came as Mr. Cohen is expected to be a key witness in the criminal case, which was brought by the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, against Mr. Trump. Ms. Daniels may also testify.
Mr. Trump has repeatedly attacked Mr. Cohen, despite a gag order issued by the judge overseeing the case, Juan M. Merchan, barring him from attacking witnesses and others. Justice Merchan is currently weighing whether Mr. Trump is in contempt of the gag order as a result of that invective.

In particular, Mr. Trump has attacked Mr. Cohen’s credibility, which will also be how Mr. Trump’s lawyers approach his former fixer during trial. The story by OAN, which has been a consistent booster of Mr. Trump’s political agenda, bolstered that strategy.
Its retraction Monday came after right-wing media outlets — including OAN — were put on warning about the publication of demonstrably false claims after a slew of defamation lawsuits following the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

Two voting technology companies, Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems, sued various outlets and commentators after they were falsely implicated, numerous times, in conspiracy theories about rigged votes that supposedly swayed the election for President Biden.
Dominion’s libel case against Fox News was settled last year, on the day the trial was set to begin. The settlement is believed to be the largest ever for a defamation case. On April 16, Smartmatic reached a settlement with OAN over the amplification of lies about the 2020 election. The terms were not disclosed.

There are several other cases pending. OAN still faces a lawsuit from Dominion, and last year it settled a separate defamation claim brought against it by a former Dominion executive. Smartmatic filed a $2.7 billion suit against Fox News in 2021, which is expected to go to trial in New York in 2025. Fox has accused Smartmatic of trying to suppress free speech with a frivolous lawsuit. A far-right website, The Gateway Pundit, filed for bankruptcy this month in the face of lawsuits by former election workers who said they were harassed because of the false claims about stolen votes that the outlet published. Jim Hoft, its publisher, said in a statement on April 24 that the bankruptcy was “not an admission of fault or culpability,” but instead “a result of the progressive liberal lawfare attacks against our media outlet.”

While conservative outlets have been fighting off legal challenges, they have also faced a drop-off in audience since the last election. The Righting, a publication that tracks the conservative media sphere, reported a decrease in traffic to the top-five right-leaning websites of 80 percent or more in the four years since February 2020.
 
He will likely skip it and go golfing....
 
So when he breaks the gag.. again.. will we finally see him jailed? I wonder how the judge will avoid it.
 
Aiken_Drumn said:
So when he breaks the gag.. again.. will we finally see him jailed? I wonder how the judge will avoid it.
Click to expand...


Thursday morning is another gag hearing on Trump's latest 4 postings. I would expect these will earn fines and then some sort of confinement might follow after the next batch. An initial confinement might be confinement during court breaks or a few hours after court in the courthouse jail or perhaps an overnight stay.
 
Hope Hicks takes the stand.
 

Here's what Hope Hicks said about the day of the "Access Hollywood" tape release​

Hope Hicks, once considered one of Donald Trump’s closest confidantes and most trusted aides, has been testifying about the moment the "Access Hollywood" tape of Trump using crude terms to describe treatment of women was released in October 2016.
  • Hicks recalled getting an email from a Washington Post reporter about Trump's now-infamous lewd, hot mic remarks, which threw his campaign into a panic.
  • Hicks recalled Trump being upset when he saw the tape, and saying the comments didn't sound like him until he reviewed it directly.
  • There was consensus in the campaign that the tape was "damaging" and that this "was a crisis," Hicks testified. She was "eventually" concerned about how the tape could impact female voters' opinions, she added.
  • Remember: Prosecutors are trying to prove that the reason Trump's team paid off Stormy Daniels was in large part in order to aid his campaign. Hicks detailing his campaign's concern over the tape could play a key role in that argument.
 
Honestly I am confused as to what Trumps plan is here. I mean, the man is neither stupid nor insane. People who are don't get to achieve the things he legitimately did. So either he has gone insane over the last couple years or he has a plan.

About the only thing that comes to mind is that he realizes the entire establishment is against him so he can't win the legal battle. So he is trying to poison the whole situation enough to turn his inevitable legal defeat into a moral victory for his followers.
 
Birdjaguar said:
  • Remember: Prosecutors are trying to prove that the reason Trump's team paid off Stormy Daniels was in large part in order to aid his campaign.
Click to expand...

Guess what.

She is a pornographic sex actress and, like those of us who are not, also expects to be paid for her work.

So what is wrong with her being paid for that?

Payment for services rendered would seem to me to be the "large part" as to why she was paid.

Arguably The Donald ought to have paid her in the first place himself from his post tax income
(but obviously he was either far too cheapskate and/or wanting an NDA went through his attorney),
OR the ultimate reimbursed payment declared a benefit for Donald and therefore taxable.

Now the people that own or contributed to the company that reimbursed his attornery
may have a grievance but they are not obvious plaintives.

Furthermore the IRS may have a grouch on The Donald thus indirectly underdeclaring income for tax purposes.
But in most sensible countries that is normally resolved by the taxation authority levying an additional sum,
and perhaps a small late payment penalty charge, without bothering to recouse to any criminal courts.

Now the use of campaign funds as an intermediary was clearly wrong, but Michael Cohen copped for that.

Going for The Donald, who is not an accountant, not a lawyer and not an expert on campaign funding laws,
for what is effectively the same offense seems to me to be very much political theatre.
 
EnglishEdward said:
Going for The Donald, who is not an accountant, not a lawyer and not an expert on campaign funding laws,
for what is effectively the same offense seems to me to be very much political theatre.
Click to expand...
Well of course it is. Thing is, just because something is in fact a political kangoroo court designed to eliminate a political rival and make sure that all the other rich people keep to the unwritten covenant between money and power does not mean Trump is innocent. Quite the contrary, it's clear he did actually break a lot of laws.

Really, that's the crux of the issue here. There ain't no such thing as an innocent rich guy. They all do what ever the hell they want acting as untouchable medieval nobility. And the powerful let them. Because that is the covenant between the two. The rich buy the powerful but don't usurp them and in turn the powerful show their gratitude by letting the rich get away with anything they bloody well want. It's a symbiotic cycle of corruption that works as long as both sides stick to their side of the bargain.

Trump broke that covenant and now the powerful will simply open up his file and sue him for the things he did actually do back when he was untouchable.
 
EnglishEdward said:
So what is wrong with her being paid for that?
Click to expand...
She wasn't. She was paid not to reveal that she had had sex with Trump.

Trump's hiding that to help his electoral chances is the offense.

You can even do that--pay hush money--but you still have to report it properly.

We have laws that govern campaigning. We don't want someone to get into office fraudulently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom