donsig
Low level intermediary
I just changed it last night after playing our turn. The horror is we've descended to using nukes ourselves and we even hit The Gulag. 
Preturn information
- Thread starter donsig
- Start date
I thought it was likely to be something like that.
All in all, I think we played a very good game.
I'm extremely curious to see if we did in fact violate that treaty as Saber claims. If so, I'll be utterly ashamed. But I really don't have time for that sort of research these days - not at least until January.
All in all, I think we played a very good game.
I'm extremely curious to see if we did in fact violate that treaty as Saber claims. If so, I'll be utterly ashamed. But I really don't have time for that sort of research these days - not at least until January.
donsig
Low level intermediary
Yeah, I think we did. I remember trying to write up a response to their claim and couldn't do it after reading and re-reading the treaty. Seems like that was a bad move on our part in hindsight but at the time it seemed to be the right move.
RFHolloway
Analyst in the UK
I would be interested to see Sabers side of the picture. From our point we were a little sloppy (did not formally terminate treaty on declaration of war, traded techs obtained without checking complience with treaty conditions), the violation was accidental not intentional, however we did wriggle quite a bit after the fact.
