Gucumatz
JS, secretly Rod Serling
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 6,181
Well the sulla-saurs who prefer not to think for themselves and rely on a completely outdated review from a former civ player speak for themselves don't they?
Personally (I played civ 3 to Civ 5), I enjoy Civ 5 the most out of the 3. Civ 4 was an inferior product to civ 3 for the longest time and it took until BTS to match Civ 3. Civ 5 is already a superior product in my opinion to both of them with just the first expansion, lets see how the 2nd expansion improves it.
For multiplayer, Civ 5 just tears Civ 4 to shreds. Most of the multiplayer community has long since moved onto Civ 5, simply because this is a game made for Human intelligence. Where AI may be lacking in SP to an extent, Civ 5 Multiplayer (outside of a buggy interface at times...) is miles better than Civ 4 ever could dream to be.
Moderator Action: Please do not use insults to make your point, Sulla-saurs?
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Personally (I played civ 3 to Civ 5), I enjoy Civ 5 the most out of the 3. Civ 4 was an inferior product to civ 3 for the longest time and it took until BTS to match Civ 3. Civ 5 is already a superior product in my opinion to both of them with just the first expansion, lets see how the 2nd expansion improves it.
For multiplayer, Civ 5 just tears Civ 4 to shreds. Most of the multiplayer community has long since moved onto Civ 5, simply because this is a game made for Human intelligence. Where AI may be lacking in SP to an extent, Civ 5 Multiplayer (outside of a buggy interface at times...) is miles better than Civ 4 ever could dream to be.
Moderator Action: Please do not use insults to make your point, Sulla-saurs?
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889