@ Lehnardtsson: The latest version is attached to a .rar file in the OP. Download and follow the installation instructions and it should be good to go.
@ Vibe: I have seriously considered releasing a map with a significantly reduced number of Civs as well as only old world Civs etc. Your list is close to my plans for the latter but you've included every African Civ and removed a number of Civs in the more high-powered regions (Europe and Middle East in particular struck me). There's actually a reasonably strong argument to be made for that approach, as it might help ensure a more consistent historical development. It might, however, make it too historically consistent. There is also the issue that Germany rarely survives long enough between France and Russia to warrant inclusion in any reduced Civ map.
Your suggested city-states, however, are both beyond the scope of this mod and against my preference to keep things as vanilla as possible. It's largely for this reason that there is a DLC map at all - if I was modding in Civs/City-States I'd ignore DLC altogether. It's a tempting approach but in the interests of not letting this project run away on me (I've still to get a working settings selection screen in order!) I fear that I'm unlikely to add those city-states in.
I'm more curious though why you want to remove Jerusalem. Testing made it pretty clear that Suez was basically a non-starter on most playthroughs unless the human got a chance to settle the city himself, and although the trip around S. Africa is not terribly long, Suez is still an important site that adds interest to the map. Have you encountered something that would suggest its removal would be of benefit?
@ Vibe: I have seriously considered releasing a map with a significantly reduced number of Civs as well as only old world Civs etc. Your list is close to my plans for the latter but you've included every African Civ and removed a number of Civs in the more high-powered regions (Europe and Middle East in particular struck me). There's actually a reasonably strong argument to be made for that approach, as it might help ensure a more consistent historical development. It might, however, make it too historically consistent. There is also the issue that Germany rarely survives long enough between France and Russia to warrant inclusion in any reduced Civ map.
Your suggested city-states, however, are both beyond the scope of this mod and against my preference to keep things as vanilla as possible. It's largely for this reason that there is a DLC map at all - if I was modding in Civs/City-States I'd ignore DLC altogether. It's a tempting approach but in the interests of not letting this project run away on me (I've still to get a working settings selection screen in order!) I fear that I'm unlikely to add those city-states in.
I'm more curious though why you want to remove Jerusalem. Testing made it pretty clear that Suez was basically a non-starter on most playthroughs unless the human got a chance to settle the city himself, and although the trip around S. Africa is not terribly long, Suez is still an important site that adds interest to the map. Have you encountered something that would suggest its removal would be of benefit?