Superheavy element found in nature

Genocidicbunny

Bug squasher
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
5,473
Location
Orange Town
The hunt for superheavy elements has focused banging various heavy nuclei together and hoping they’ll stick. In this way, physicists have extended the periodic table by manufacturing elements 111, 112, 114, 116 and 118, albeit for vanishingly small instants. Although none of these elements is particularly long lived, they don’t have progressively shorter lives and this is taken as evidence that islands of nuclear stability exist out there and that someday we’ll find stable superheavy elements.

But if these superheavy nuclei are stable, why don’t we find them already on Earth? Turns out we do; they’ve been here all along. The news today is that a group led by Amnon Marinov at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has found the first naturally occuring superheavy nuclei by sifting through a large pile of the heavy metal thorium.

What they did was fire one thorium nucleus after another through a mass spectrometer to see how heavy each was. Thorium has an atomic number of 90 and occurs mainly in two isotopes with atomic weights of 230 and 232. All these showed up in the measurements along with a various molecular oxides and hydrides that form for technical reasons.

But something else showed up too. An element with a weight of 292 and an atomic number of around 122. That’s an extraordinary claim and quite rightly the team has been diligent in attempting to exclude alternative explanations such as th epresence of exotic molecules formed from impurities in the thorium sample or from the hydrocarbon in oil used in the vacuum pumping equipment). But these have all been ruled out, say Marinov and his buddies.

What they’re left with is the discovery of the first superheavy element, probably number 122.

What do we know about 122? Marinov and co say it has a half life in excess of 100 million years and occurs with an abundance of between 1 and 10 x10^-12, relative to thorium, which is a fairly common element (about as abundant as lead).

Theorists have mapped out the superheavy periodic table and 122 would be a member of the superheavy actinide group. It even has a name: eka-thorium or unbibium. Welcome to our world!

This may well open the flood gates to other similar discoveries. Uranium is the obvious next place to look for superheavy actinides. I’d bet good money that Marinov and his pals are eyeballing the stuff as I write.
http://arxivblog.com/?p=385

This is the coolest piece of news ive heard all week. Correct me if im wrong, but this is the first stable element with a g-shell. If so, as the guy said, this is opening some pretty big gates.
 
I've checked it on wikipedia. Elements with an electron on the first g-shell are really called superactinoids.
Damn cool!
 
If this is true (and that's a major if, as I haven't come across this on any major news site yet), it's a big discovery. I think it was element 126 they reckoned would be most stable in that region of the periodic table? Conceivably 122 is on the lower end of the island of stability.
 
Damn interesting, that is true, but I'm wondering what they will call a mineral that includes the atom.
 
I'm a bit sceptical, since google only mentions some shaddy blogs when searching, but if it's true, it's a huge discovery.
 
First they would have to figure its physical properties. So little of it has been collected that its impossible to experiment on it.
 
Poor journalistic style trying too hard to pass scientists as human beings capable of feelings and emotions.

I am sure that scientists are human beings capable of feelings and emotions, and that they have pals and buddies. I am also sure that the set of "scientific associate" and "pal and/or buddy" is not mutually inclusive for all scientists.

Wait, what?
 
I thought that Mendeleev's periodical table was all about predicting the properties of elements according to their place in it?

1) The periodic table only makes predictions for the chemical properties and not the physical properties.

2) It makes only predictions. Nature doesn't have to obey the predictions we make. Experiments would have to be made to see, if these predictions actually work.

3) According to the predictions the element in question would be the first discovered one to have electrons in the "g-subshell" (l=4) in its ground state. It is hard to extrapolate from the periodic table, because there would be no other element like it.

4) There are quite some elements that have a slightly different electron configuration than the one predicted by the periodic table and therefore they behave differently than one might expect.
 
Top Bottom