Eh, the last three about lobbyists are fine, and I'm actually a yuge fan of #4 (5-year ban on lobbying by ex-members of Congress). The hiring freeze is a bad idea for a number of reasons, and while I'm sure there needs to be regulatory overhaul and simplification, creating a rigid rule like "remove two regulations for every new one imposed" is probably not a good way to get there and will likely lead to the selective gutting of systemically important regulations, e.g. post-2008 financial regulations.
On other things, I'm a fan of detente with Russia, ceasing to expand NATO, and pressuring other NATO countries to increase military spending up to the agreed 2% of GDP level, although I'd certainly not go so far as to not defend states based on how much they've paid. I also oppose US support of regime change for ostensibly pro-democracy reasons, but any war we ended up in anyway should not involve torture or resource plundering. I oppose the TPP and other free-trade agreements that actually have little to do with free trade, which is a position Trump would agree with, but wouldn't support starting trade wars with major trading partners.
So there's a little bit of agreement there, but not much. Where I agree with Trump, it's usually on his points of disagreement with the "mainstream" Republican party. The Republicans in general have gone insane, and there's not much I can find to support there even though I'm generally good at finding points of agreement with people who have different ideologies.
If a left-wing or centrist populist candidate appeared, I'd consider voting for them if I agreed with their economic policies even if they also appealed to nativists and bigots, depending on exactly how bigoted their appeals were and whether they are targeted to specific audiences (Trump fails on both counts). This is probably a difference between me and most other CFC people.
