To Simon's original question, "What are the reactions of the others here"?
<FONT size="4"><u>IS "EVIL" EVIL?</u></FONT s>
I think following this whole ordeal has reinforced and reminded me of something very important. In reading more about McVeigh (mostly spurred by y'all talking about it here), I continue to realize that those we call "evil" are almost never simply, purely evil. Instead, they are doing what they feel is "good" & "right" for that situation (like any of us day-to-day) ... they have simply let go of certain priorities that most of us value (like the sanctity and sacredness of human life, in this case). That's no small thing, to be sure, but it is a very simple difference ... not a dramatic or "evil" one. [I'm NOT defending what he did ... he shouldn't have done it ... but I am looking for (and surprising finding) the humanity in him.]
<FONT size="4"><u>BEING TIM McVEIGH</u></FONT s>
From all this, I'm reminded that EVERY person is a human being. A person who was born an innocent child and went through a specific & unique set of life experiences. I can't say, with 100% assurance, that if I had lived the exact same life as McVeigh, beginning to end (obviously impossible), that I wouldn't at least be tempted or have thought about doing the same thing. Of course, I HOPE I would have handled his life better than he did ... that I would have retained my value for life through whatever he went through and NOT done what he did ... but who really knows?
<FONT size="4"><u>OUR PROBLEM W/ IT</u></FONT s>
I think we don't want to see the human side of someone we think is "evil" because then it's harder to kill him (or even harshly punish him) and still feel OK about it. It's MUCH, MUCH easier to label someone "evil" and then dispense with him. The problem is he was not ACTUALLY purely "evil" ... he was a human being, once an innocent child like we were ... he was not "a demon" as one witness said. I think we just choose to view him that way to make OURSELVES feel better and justified.
<FONT size="4"><u>MOVIE "BAD GUYS"</u></FONT s>
Y'know how all of our movies and shows portray "the bad guys" as essentially plain evil, sometimes with a backstory to explain it? Soaps even just write up some evil character without any explanation ... they're just plain bad! "Yes, I will continue with my evil, evil plans ... <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/mwaha.gif" border=0>" These are kind of characters YOU WANT TO SEE DEAD because you can't find any good in them to make them redeemable. (sound familiar?)
<FONT size="4"><u>IT'S NOT REAL</u></FONT s>
But even though we extend that cultural mythical archetype of the "evil one" into the real world, we know it's completely ridiculous if we think about it. No one in real life calls themselves "evil" like they do in the movies (and actually means it, except maybe in the current DarkX thread <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/wink.gif" border=0> ). Sure, people may do things they know others wouldn't like or things that even they themselves would call "bad". And they know it is "bad" by the common, popular definition. But sometimes people feel forced into doing "bad" things because the only other choices seem WORSE! For McVeigh, maybe letting the gov't "get away with" what he thought were atrocities was WORSE than not acting at all.
<FONT size="4"><u>THE IRONY</u></FONT s>
Regardless, all people (including McVeigh) think they are "right" or at least doing the best thing given their view of Life and definition of "what's best". McVeigh thought he was "dispensing justice" to an unlawful gov't that violated regular law & moral law. Since you can't arrest & criminally charge the gov't, this is what he came up with, with his military mind and background. Sure, his dispensing of justice sadly killed others ... but to him, he was killing those responsible for killing innocents (in his mind) in Waco/Ruby Ridge. But that's just what we did to him! ... took a life because he took innocent lives. He was taking lives because THEY took what HE thought were innocent lives! We didn't do anything different. But we'll tell ourselves he's "evil" to feel better.
<FONT size="4"><u>GOOD BAD GUYS</u></FONT s>
Anyway, back to the movies (as they relate to life), I feel the best and most accurate portrayal of any "bad guy" on screen is when you are left feeling for and understanding the character and his motives to the point where you can't quite decide which side should win in the end. When you believe the people on both sides WANT to do good, and they are both doing what they THINK is good, but you end up siding with the "real" good guys ONLY because the acts and the METHODS of the "bad guys" just aren't OK with you.
<FONT size="4"><u>X-MEN!</u></FONT s>
The X-Men movie was a great example of this. Magneto wanted to cause mutations in world leaders so they would know what it feels like to be a mutant while making their anti-mutant decisions. If I was a mutant feeling hunted by the gov't, I'd be VERY tempted to give them an experience of my plight if I could! I could feel Magneto's anger at being an outcast all his life when he have been treated as a forward movement in the human race. In that movie, the REAL bad guy was the senator calling for anti-mutant practices. The "bad" mutants were against the "evil" senator, not directly against the other "good mutants". It's only that Magneto's machine affected people so adversely and ultimately killed them that had me finally cheer for the X-men (& women). Otherwise, I really felt for Magneto and understood his motives. THAT, folks, is a rare and fair portrayal of a "bad guy", in movies and real life.
If you're open to alternate points of view, this could be what McVeigh was. He attempted to avenge the deaths of others by causing more deaths ... and so did we. And so we move on, hopefully learning something ... whatever that might be for each of us ...
Spiff <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/scan.gif" border=0>
[This message has been edited by SpacemanSpiff (edited June 12, 2001).]