bah it will have weak production. they'll just be busy milking money out of their cottages and won't contribute hammers.
Who cares? It's not a production city. My floodplain dwelling citizens are supposed to be industrious desk jockies, toiling at ambiguous commercial enterprises. The idea that they would labor over things like Barracks and units is sordid and slovenly.
20 floodplains=8
so all but the strongest will die from the plague. The men will have to "work" the cottages all day to ensure a positive growth rate.
I'm a magnanimous leader. I see no reason why my white-collar cottage-commoners should push papers without proper medical care. That is why we will store grains in the granary, and stock the grocers with a myriad of salubrious victuals. And when the horsemen of Ataxia and Ruination ride to the city on their sickly green clouds, I will stand on the roof of my expensive SUV, look them in the eye, and yell, "You shall not claim the lives of my surburbanites! I will whip them to make Aqueducts and Hospitals before you can do so!"
And if that fails, I'll just let specialists die. Because who honestly cares about them anyway?
Just like anything in life, too much of a good thing can be bad for you (even floodplains). the ideal city site is almost certainly a mix of many terrain types, not all the same.
That's not true. You can never have enough tap-dancing puppies, it's been proven mathematically:
(Tap-dancing puppies) * (Infinity) = Kickass
Even if those puppies become rabid and kill us, everyone agrees that's a kickass way to die, even if you don't realize it yet. That's why all the residents of my dream city will have tap-dancing puppies.
I'd also build the Statue of Liberty in my city, but I'd construct her in a provocative pose. Just for kicks.