I played vanilla civ when it came out, then stopped playing for a few years and I've been trying out BtS recently. In a recent game I took a holy city from an opponent on the other side of a pangea continent (it was the holy city for a VERY dominant religion, and had a shrine), and I anticipated much difficulty in keeping it due to a culture flip.
From my prior (vanilla) knowledge, I brought along a Great Artist and culture bombed my new city, knowing it would end the riot and should soon give me the city's fat cross at least. WRONG. Even though taking the city had erased all the adjacent culture, the borders didn't expand, even after I waited several turns.
Eventually the city was consumed by opponents' culture, leaving me only some ocean squares. It was semi-late game (around 1500AD) and on Noble, so I understand that culture is well-established at that point. But I'm also sure that 4000 culture was more than any adjacent cities had.
With the exception of immediately ending riots, are Great Artists no good for warmongering now?
From my prior (vanilla) knowledge, I brought along a Great Artist and culture bombed my new city, knowing it would end the riot and should soon give me the city's fat cross at least. WRONG. Even though taking the city had erased all the adjacent culture, the borders didn't expand, even after I waited several turns.
Eventually the city was consumed by opponents' culture, leaving me only some ocean squares. It was semi-late game (around 1500AD) and on Noble, so I understand that culture is well-established at that point. But I'm also sure that 4000 culture was more than any adjacent cities had.
With the exception of immediately ending riots, are Great Artists no good for warmongering now?