But it will make a race for a religion way more important in this way, and it will be more meaningful to decid which religion to follow.
Might be interesting.
But it will make a race for a religion way more important in this way, and it will be more meaningful to decid which religion to follow.
Might be interesting.
Well I guess there will still be an incentive to RE-capture your holy city. This is what most religious wars are about after all. Unfortunately multiple civs just seem to imagine that the same place is THEIR holy city...
Based on what I remember hearing from interviews...
Religions do have a holy city. If you capture it, you do not get the founder beliefs. However, if the original civilization takes it back, they regain the founder beliefs.
I would also speculate that holy cities are automatically put in civ capitals. This way, they cannot be razed by invaders. But who knows.
I don't think it's a good way to go. As it adds too much incentives to go to war and take the benefit of religions so easily. Any thing oriented towards war is bad implementation.
I don't think it's a good way to go. As it adds too much incentives to go to war and take the benefit of religions so easily. Any thing oriented towards war is bad implementation.
You'd obviously lose the benefit of expanding your current religion when founding a new one. But is it possible at all?
Nah, since there's supposed to be 0.5 religions per civ in the game I'm sure there no chance there will be a religion left when you get your second Great Prophet.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.