Spoiler :I think that's true only if there was a "Nexus Event" between when the Infinity Stones were 'borrowed' and when Loki picked up the Tesseract in the lobby of Stark Tower. That's why I proposed the idea that Steve was not entirely successful in his mission to restore the Stones and Mjolnir to their proper places. If he had been, that timeline would have gone essentially unperturbed until Loki escaped with the Tesseract - which was a Nexus Event - and been pruned along with it.
The connection between time travel and alternate universes in the MCU lies with Nexus Events. As long as there's no Nexus Event, you can travel back in time and still be on the same timeline. Timelines in the MCU evidently have some flexibility, and therefore some resistance to "the Butterfly Effect." Only key changes cause a shift that's dramatic enough to spawn a whole new timeline. That was why Steve had to go back and restore the Stones in the first place. for example, Frigga encountering slovenly Thor didn't produce a Nexus Event. She was wise enough to avoid it, and she stopped Thor from telling her any more than he already had. She could handle merely meeting Future-Thor in a corridor and intuiting that whatever was going on was dire without knowing any of the details (iirc, she seemed to know she was doomed). Steve returning Mjolnir and the Stones an instant after they'd been taken wouldn't wipe that memory from Frigga's mind, so we can infer that Frigga encountering Fat Thor and his rabbit friend in the hallway was not a Nexus Event. Frigga, the Ancient One, and the Avengers didn't have the term "Nexus Event" in their vocabulary, but they had grasped the concept.
Spoiler spoiler tag war :
Well, details on the pruning are a bit scant, we don't know if the timeline is retroactively obliterated, or it's stalled at that point and as such anything prior still counts as having happened. Or how it melds back into the Sacred Timeline, if it does. Wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey for sure
But yes, if we take the literal interpretation of the Avengers' actions being canonical / required by He Who Remains (for whatever reason), then anything up to the Tesseract landing at Loki's feet would've been fine. That's my take on it at least.
But yes, if we take the literal interpretation of the Avengers' actions being canonical / required by He Who Remains (for whatever reason), then anything up to the Tesseract landing at Loki's feet would've been fine. That's my take on it at least.
Fun aside on Frigga that I don't think is spoiler-worthy, but I believe in Thor (or Thor 2?) it was insinuated that she had a talent for foretelling. So I think she had a vague idea regardless, of how things would end up. I think her characterisation (relatively serene, all things told) backs this up, but that's just completely my opinion.
Not that bad. There are flaws for sure, and in the interests of not derailing the thread the less I say about Whedon the better, but it's aged relatively gracefully (for someone who grew up with it). It would probably be more jarring to a teen or young adult watching it now (for any number of reasons, the setting is very late 90s / early 00s).I watched the heck out of that show when it aired, but I don't think I've seen it since. I'm curious how it holds up, what with everything.