You call this wonder?
Perhaps it is not a wonder, but it is a building Protestant
Not met a wonder protestant
You call this wonder?
The Trowulan Ruin looks very similar to the Cham towers in central Vietnam. I know Cham and Indonesian are both Austronesian, but it didn't think their architectures were so resembling each other.
Spoiler :
the similar architecture in all southeast asia were spread by srivijayan empire, 4 centuries before majapahit. Srivijaya is centered at the island of sumatera, but later conquered java island, and large portion of mainland southeast asia.
I want the Flavian Amphitheater, AKA The Colosseum. It irks me to no end that one of the recognized wonders of the world has been relegated to the bottom-tier happiness building that you put in all of your cities.
the similar architecture in all southeast asia were spread by srivijayan empire, 4 centuries before majapahit. Srivijaya is centered at the island of sumatera, but later conquered java island, and large portion of mainland southeast asia.
Hm, I just went over some Cham's annals, and they claim that the Cham got their architecture from the Indians. So is it India or Srivijiaya? Maybe both?
The intriguing thing is these towers only exist in central Vietnam but not in the northern and southern parts of the country.
If there is room for more modern wonders, this would be nice. I've always wished there were more in the later eras: there is hardly anything to build but military units then.
Gateway Arch- USA
Spoiler :
Both.
The amount of interaction going on between all those powers was pretty heavy so you'll see influences overlapping
while this is true, do remember that it was actually Srivijaya's Syailendran dynasty who first inspire the siamese to build the wats. That temple is most probably another syailendran inspire temple or works on champa lands.
So I just read about that Cham tower. Its name is Ponashu http://vietnamdiscovery.com/destination/mui-ne/hightlight/ponashu-cham-towers/ postulated to be built in the late 8th century to worship a Hindduist god. The oldest known standing Cham tower is Po Nagar built in 781; so, unless the preliminary evaluation is worng, Ponashu must be erected within the time frame from 781 to 799.
The earliest mention of the Syailendran dynasty is in 778 from the Kalasan inscription. So, it is possible that the Chams was inspired by the Syailendras. However, the time window is very small.
Could it be that both the Syailendras and the Chams' architecture were inspired by that of an earlier kingdom of Southeast Asia's archipelago?
srivijaya is ruled by king Dahranindra at 775-800 ad, the very king that instructed the candi sewu (1000 candi complex) and started the borobudur project. Srivijaya was also conquered chen la (a kingdom that cover parts of cambodia, thailand, and vietnam) at 790 ad. Although losing them again 2 years after Dahranindra passed away.
I think the probability is good that the temple is Dahranindra's, considering that it is a mahayana hindu, a hindu branch that actually of candi sewu complex.
Wait, you mean Dahranindra ordered the construction that temple? But it cant be because the temple lies deep in Champa's not Chenla's territory. Chenla only covered Southern Vietnam (even at its zenith it never successfully took any of Champa's territory until it morphed into the Khmer Empire, but that happened centuries later), these temple are in the central part.
I am still a lot more biased towards the theory of cultural interaction than outright subjugation.