I do like Civ V. Yes I complain about, but I do enjoy the game. I think it's a very good game, not a great or perfect game as some people say. Well we all have different opnions. What I can not understand is this. Call to Power 2 got scathing reviews. Many people say that game sucks big time when it was released. Funny thing is, I see Civ V just like Call to Power 2 on release. Very poor AI, very bad diplomacy. So all the scathing that CtP2 got, I see in Civ V. So how come it is acceptable for Civ V and not for CtP2?
Could it be because CtP2 has more options? CtP2 has way more units, technology and things to build?
CtP2 did things differently just like Civ V did. CtP2 has a poor AI which was the main reason people say they didn't get it. Civ V has poor or even worse AI than CtP2 but it's ok now all of a sudden.
So the only reason why I see people Civ V like this game more than CtP2 is because there is way less options. Tech tree is about half the size than CtP2. There is less units and less options. Less things to do. So is this why Civ V is so much better?
So why is Civ V better than CtP2 when all the bad things in CtP2 are in Civ V.
I swear if the name Sid Miers Civilization wasn't in the title, Civ V wouldn't be getting such rave reviews and defence it is getting.
Could it be because CtP2 has more options? CtP2 has way more units, technology and things to build?
CtP2 did things differently just like Civ V did. CtP2 has a poor AI which was the main reason people say they didn't get it. Civ V has poor or even worse AI than CtP2 but it's ok now all of a sudden.
So the only reason why I see people Civ V like this game more than CtP2 is because there is way less options. Tech tree is about half the size than CtP2. There is less units and less options. Less things to do. So is this why Civ V is so much better?
So why is Civ V better than CtP2 when all the bad things in CtP2 are in Civ V.
I swear if the name Sid Miers Civilization wasn't in the title, Civ V wouldn't be getting such rave reviews and defence it is getting.