Referee Q&A
- Thread starter X-Worf
- Start date
Damned!
At the other team I posted this link:
http://www.civforum.de/showthread.php?p=3943558#post3943558
Please check it. At the moment there are two main options:
A) Rommel is out of DG in confirming with the rules. (only rejoining his old team is possible)
B) In accordance with all teams he can be:
B1) A full third referee
B2) A assistant of referees. (check turn lock/clock, but no voice on internal referee polls)
B2) It's allowed to him join another team
I red cyc's statement. I need a team dicision, a statement of the team captain (it's maybe the same) and all other statements like cyc's posts. If we follow any B-option, it's imtortant, that it's okay for all members. The first priority is the DG and that all teams and players thrust each other to stay fair. To help one "quitted" player is not the priority.
A Rommel statement:
At the other team I posted this link:
http://www.civforum.de/showthread.php?p=3943558#post3943558
Please check it. At the moment there are two main options:
A) Rommel is out of DG in confirming with the rules. (only rejoining his old team is possible)
B) In accordance with all teams he can be:
B1) A full third referee
B2) A assistant of referees. (check turn lock/clock, but no voice on internal referee polls)
B2) It's allowed to him join another team
I red cyc's statement. I need a team dicision, a statement of the team captain (it's maybe the same) and all other statements like cyc's posts. If we follow any B-option, it's imtortant, that it's okay for all members. The first priority is the DG and that all teams and players thrust each other to stay fair. To help one "quitted" player is not the priority.
A Rommel statement:
Calis
on time
As we are not the team he is about to leave (or left already), I am fine with either B2 and B3 (I think you wanted to call it B3) 
And one item more: the turn clock discusion (this and the following posts)
(Reasoning: This way, the turn clock is easier to calculate manually and easier to read.)
(Reasoning: This way, the turn clock is easier to calculate manually and easier to read.)
Cyc
Looking for the door...
As far as Rommel goes, my final statement is posted here. It was posted when I was still officially Team Captain, I believe. Yes, it was - just checked. I also believe Rommel only requested position B2 (the first B2) so that's what I approved. If Rommel wants to participate more as Ref or player, that's fine also.
On the turn clock issue, I'm not sure how many Eagles are following the discussion, other than Calis and myself. There is a new Team Captain now, Sparthage, and I am willing to bet that he would approve of the change to rule 10.2. The change will make things less complicated and easier to post/read.
so that's what I approved. If Rommel wants to participate more as Ref or player, that's fine also.On the turn clock issue, I'm not sure how many Eagles are following the discussion, other than Calis and myself. There is a new Team Captain now, Sparthage, and I am willing to bet that he would approve of the change to rule 10.2. The change will make things less complicated and easier to post/read.
Sparthage
Fighting Tyranny
@X-Worf and Others: I've been following the conversation on and off and was aware of the situation. I saw Cyc's comment soon after it was posted and I agree with him I also recall a comment about how there are more posts in the CivForum private forums and Cyc's highly amusing response 
, now if I can only find it...
Also, the Rule Change is fine. I thought for a second you were discussing the Rommel Referee issue.
, now if I can only find it...Also, the Rule Change is fine. I thought for a second you were discussing the Rommel Referee issue.
Please, check both postings.
Calis
on time
I already recognized it. Ugly movie. 
Thank you anyway!
Please keep us informed.
Thank you anyway!
Please keep us informed.
Sparthage
Fighting Tyranny
That's good.
Hi Eagles,
the ISDG needs your turn:
A) Eagles plays the turn within the next 2 hours. (Time clock continues with a negative value - this is an exception)
B) Eagles use her 2nd time out
C) I play the turn in 2 hours or tomorrow morning
the ISDG needs your turn:
There are three options:
A) Eagles plays the turn within the next 2 hours. (Time clock continues with a negative value - this is an exception)
B) Eagles use her 2nd time out
C) I play the turn in 2 hours or tomorrow morning
Cyc
Looking for the door...
Worf is gone until June 6th.
Calis
on time
Did Kueche complain about this move? I did not read the threads, yet?
There was no hostile intend in this move.
I will clarify with Kueche.
There was no hostile intend in this move.
I will clarify with Kueche.
Calis
on time
Calis
on time
Is it necessary to have an ingame RoP. Or is an agreement in the embassy enough?
However, if it happend with hostile intend or not, 6.2 is a clear rule. In the strict sense we would have to repeat the last turn and I would have to impose a restriction on Eagles.
An embassy agreement would be sufficient.
